Fin Fang Foom And The Return Of Kristian/Houston

March 18, 2003

FFF strikes again, posting on things he know nothing about. His dumb speculation on the "Kristian scam" is clearly meant to cause trouble.

Then FFF enlarges the discussion to enlighten us that all escorts really hate what they do. Seems like an conclusion that most clients

of this site have enough personal knowledge to know is untrue.

As to the "Kristian scam," people have already pointed out that his reviews are all excellent. I hired him for an overnight when he worked for Premier last April. Kristian, "the scam artist," refused a $100 tip because he thought he was not at his best because of all the clients Premier had scheduled for him that week.

FFF is the Michael Jackson of this site. Compared to FFF, every one else can feel a little better about themselves and thank God they are not Fin Fang Foom.

March 18, 2003

FFF strikes again, posting on things he know nothing about. His dumb speculation on the "Kristian scam" is clearly meant to cause trouble.

Then FFF enlarges the discussion to enlighten us that all escorts really hate what they do. Seems like an conclusion that most clients

of this site have enough personal knowledge to know is untrue.

As to the "Kristian scam," people have already pointed out that his reviews are all excellent. I hired him for an overnight when he worked for Premier last April. Kristian, "the scam artist," refused a $100 tip because he thought he was not at his best because of all the clients Premier had scheduled for him that week.

FFF is the Michael Jackson of this site. Compared to FFF, every one else can feel a little better about themselves and thank God they are not Fin Fang Foom.

Rick Munroe · March 18, 2003

>the vicious and despicable bile that spews from the bowel

>that passes for FFF's soul.

That's a great metaphor but I don't think it's deserved. IMNSHO ("in my not-so-humble opinion") (whose opinions on here are ever really humble?), he's just a very conservative person who (a) likes to get message board people riled up (an easy thing to do), (b) truly believes the dumb stuff he posts, and © has maybe taken a few too many creative writing courses at the New School. Pretty harmless if you ask me.

Rick Munroe · March 18, 2003

>the vicious and despicable bile that spews from the bowel

>that passes for FFF's soul.

That's a great metaphor but I don't think it's deserved. IMNSHO ("in my not-so-humble opinion") (whose opinions on here are ever really humble?), he's just a very conservative person who (a) likes to get message board people riled up (an easy thing to do), (b) truly believes the dumb stuff he posts, and © has maybe taken a few too many creative writing courses at the New School. Pretty harmless if you ask me.

BobbyB · March 18, 2003

>>>That's a great metaphor but I don't think it's deserved. IMNSHO ("in my not-so-humble opinion")

And I, equally humbly, disagree. (And I really mean that.) It's one thing to make an accusation that's so absurd, or couched in such a way that everyone is in on the joke. But to make a statement that fundamentally impugns a person's character is not anything that approaches acceptable, humorous, or fun.

We aren't a bunch of like-minded friends taking good-natured liberties with each other over a pizza and a beer. This is a public forum. I have read enough of your postings to know that you aren't a person who would take such liberties, and I also appreciate the fact that you may not be comfortable with this (or any) unpleasant confrontation. But take your natural peace-making tendencies and apply them to the party who was TRULY wronged. It wasn't FFF. It was Kristian.

Go back to the beginning of this thread. Reread FFF's accusation. Does he offer anything that approximates proof? No, he doesn't. And that is my point. We can joke & cajole as much as we want to, but not at the expense of another person's integrity. In a public forum, that is off limits, and for a person to think otherwise is to suggest that their amusement is of greater importance than anything that resembles decency or fair play. Again, FFF is not the injured party here, it is Kristian.

With that said, I respectfully look forward to your thoughts.

- BobbyB

BobbyB · March 18, 2003

>>>That's a great metaphor but I don't think it's deserved. IMNSHO ("in my not-so-humble opinion")

And I, equally humbly, disagree. (And I really mean that.) It's one thing to make an accusation that's so absurd, or couched in such a way that everyone is in on the joke. But to make a statement that fundamentally impugns a person's character is not anything that approaches acceptable, humorous, or fun.

We aren't a bunch of like-minded friends taking good-natured liberties with each other over a pizza and a beer. This is a public forum. I have read enough of your postings to know that you aren't a person who would take such liberties, and I also appreciate the fact that you may not be comfortable with this (or any) unpleasant confrontation. But take your natural peace-making tendencies and apply them to the party who was TRULY wronged. It wasn't FFF. It was Kristian.

Go back to the beginning of this thread. Reread FFF's accusation. Does he offer anything that approximates proof? No, he doesn't. And that is my point. We can joke & cajole as much as we want to, but not at the expense of another person's integrity. In a public forum, that is off limits, and for a person to think otherwise is to suggest that their amusement is of greater importance than anything that resembles decency or fair play. Again, FFF is not the injured party here, it is Kristian.

With that said, I respectfully look forward to your thoughts.

- BobbyB

March 18, 2003

>Go back to the beginning of this thread. Reread FFF's

>accusation. Does he offer anything that approximates proof?

>No, he doesn't. Again, FFF is not the injured party here, it is

>Kristian.

Let's review the facts - they always get lost in these discussions.

Here's what we know:

It's leaked to the message board through a "good friend" of Kristian's that something awful occurred: the FBI (not the local sheriff) broke down his door, threw him to the floor, carried him (and his computers - plural) into the night and they confiscated his life savings.

Contrary to an earlier post, Kristian NEVER said that it was because of prostitution - IN FACT, NO explaination was EVER given as to what happened. Instead, we're told it's a private matter and how traumatized Kristian is by the whole affair and how his life is "ruined", blah blah blah. Oh yeah, I forgot, and how he and Athan may have to LEAVE THE STATE, no less.

THEN, up pops a legal defense fund by a gullible but well-meaning poster. It's anybody's guess how many putzes gave money to THAT farrago. Yet, we still hear nothing.

And then, like every other "hot" topic on this board, the whole brou-ha-ha faded away.

That is, until, lo and behold, a review for Kristian popped back up and I exhumed the corpse of the original topic.

Let's use some logic on this story, shall we? If what had been reported had REALLY happened, do you think for a moment, Kristian would be in any position to start whoring again? I've said from the beginning that the story smelled and nothing has ever been offered to clear the stench from the room.

My guess has always been that if it DID occur then it was all about drugs. The story sounded like a drug bust to me.

So for those of you who think I'm impuning someone's character - sue me. This is an anonymous message board with people expressing their opinions. Some guy tells us a story with NO PROOF and then expects us all to believe it as though it were the Gospel - AND, hopefully send money to help the poor poor soul.

Now REEEEEEEALLY.

Generously yours,

FFF

March 18, 2003