Chicago Str8 acting College Guy type??

[Guest ncm2169]

Hey, I'm planning a trip to Chicago, and I'm looking for suggestions for young (18-25) "str8-acting" college-type guys. As usual I've read all the reviews, and been to all the escort sites. Does anyone have any experience with any of the following:

 

Robb (on Guys4Rent)

Clint (on MeetLocalMen)

Andy (on MeetLocalMen)

 

 

Hey thanks guys, and any other suggestions would be VERY welcome!!

 

P.S. Big Squirt, hold your fire. :+

[taylorky]

>Hey, I'm planning a trip to Chicago, and I'm looking for

>suggestions for young (18-25) "str8-acting" college-type guys.

 

 

i don't want to start a big yelling match with anyone,but..............what the fuck is straight acting????does it mean he won't let u fuck him in the butt,or he won't suck your dick because he's "acting straight"...nah......does it mean he wears a wife beater and says things like ..........yooooo adriannnnn....nah...ahhhhhh maybe he beats up on faggotts..no no thats not it........maybe it means he is masculine, because only straight guys are masculine...........all fags are cringing little effeminate sissys.yea i bet thats it....BULLSHIT..... among my friends (gay & straight) the straight ones are more effeminate than the gay guys and its not an act on either side.why do we have so little respect for our people that we look to the breeders as examples of perfection, esp since it's false straight does not=masculine,gay does not =effeminate.all blacks do not love watermelon and all jews do not love gefilte.get a grip people,have some pride........you want a masculine guy .........its simple to say "i want a masculine guy"...has nothing to do with straight or gay acting...............taylor@14:10-0310/03

[Like2Hire]

oooooo, taylor, you sound so str8.....oooops, i mean MASCULINE! ;-)

[+ glutes]

I think what he is requesting is someone who isn't a prissy queen. Simple enough request.

 

-But that is just my opinion, I could be wrong- Dennis Miller

[taylorky]

>I think what he is requesting is someone who isn't a prissy

>queen. Simple enough request.

>

>-But that is just my opinion, I could be wrong- Dennis

>Miller

 

 

 

than why not just say ......"no prissy queens"........a lot of straight's are prissy queens.......so straight acting could give him what he doesn't want.why do so many gay guys have so little self esteem that they think the only way not to get a prissy queen is to act for a person that acts straight?????????taylor@17:06-03/10/03

[BuckyXTC]

Taylor:

 

First, let me say I'm really glad you post here. It is refreshing to hear your viewpoint on a host of issues and I think you're utterly delightful!

 

Yes, it is pretty amazing how we develop some strange ideas about straight vs gay, masculine or effeminate, etc. What I've learned over time is that while I find masculne guys much more attractive, at least from a sexual standpoint, I also enjoy the friendship of some folks who tend to be effeminate in some of their mannerisms. Bottom line for me, is that I'm pretty comfortable with all kinds of people. I'd even go so far to say that I consider my life richer because of that diversity. Sure would be a boring world if everyone was the same. It has been my experience that when we're comfortable with ourselves and who we are, we can be pretty comfortable with just about everyone else.

 

As for ncm, I think he's a nice guy, and don't think he's trying to imply anything out of bounds in using the term "straight acting". But I do agree with you, Taylor, that saying "masculine" is probably a better descriptor.

[Guest ncm2169]

Taylor, chill out. :o

 

My post made a reference to a "type", a type which most readers and posters here understand. I have no problem with your analysis about who "appears" str8-acting and who has what sexuality, and how stereotypes about the same are often unfair. I do, however, question whether this site is the place to have that dialogue/argument.

 

Please continue to post here...I usually delight in your posts. But, please don't hijack a thread with your polemics...it's just not a nice thing to do. :*

[Guest rizzuto]

Consider Michael Adam. Very pleasant and attitude-free, ultra-clean, and a regular-guy type. I saw him last fall and was extremely pleased.

[+ Lucky]

taylor's post was appropriate and well-said. As an expert on masculine men, the term str8 acting is ludicrous to me too.

[Guest ncm2169]

Thanks Rizzuto!! It's nice to have my thread back. :o

[+ Lucky]

If you truly love a thread you will set it free.

[Guest ncm2169]

Dude, I truly love you, and I hereby set you free.

 

Now gimme back my goddamn fucking thread!! :+

[+ Lucky]

LOL

[VaHawk]

I agree with what you're saying, but str8 acting is pretty much an ingrained "label" within the gay community and that ncm didn't mean anything offensive or derogatory by it. My interpretation of it is that it means a gay who by his dress, actions or way of speaking does not come across as the "Jack type character" on the Will and Grace TV show. Not that there is anything wrong with the so called "Nellies" yet another label, as I have known and loved many of them in my life. As they say "different strokes".

 

I, myself do not like labels such as "dyke", "butch", "nellie" , "queen" , "twink" ad nauseum. Labels are for clothes, not people, but I've taken hell on this board before for this position, as it was pointed out to me "nothing offensive is meant by it" and it is just a way of identifying a type.

But, imo, labels are useless as one branded with a particular label is not always what that label implies, especially when that label is based on physical attributes. But speaking for myself, I DO find labels offensive, as most people have many different personas and interests and categorizing someone via a "label" diminishes a person as a whole.

 

I hope one day, that regardless of sexual orientation, that people can look at each other and see a person not some "label" who they expect to act like the "label" they have been tagged with.

 

Oh well, I hope I didn't stray off course, but as long as there are young gays out there with your compassion about this issue, then there is hope!

[Guest ncm2169]

So, now that I have my thread back , who knows of some guys who are this "type" ?? :7

[tedbear]

>So, now that I have my thread back , who knows of some

>guys who are this "type" ?? :7

 

 

<sigh> Not to continue the hijack, but...

 

Just TRY to describe this "type" without using terms that bother many gay men. You say that "a type which most readers and posters here understand." Please try to understand that the term you used is offensive to many gay men (and all gay men should find it offensive).

 

It implies that there is a negative about being gay-acting (WHATEVER that means). Think about it. It's the same as saying to a fellow employee "You're a great black manager" instead of "You're a great manager." Take the qualifier out and you've got a compliment. Leave it in and you're insulting someone.

 

Seriously--Stop and think about it before you respond. Just try to see how the term yould be offensive.

 

I absolutely do not intend to be hard on you. You just some don't seem to grasp the issue. Try to understand that when you use that term you're putting yourself (and other gay men) down.

 

You may now return to your regularly scheduled thread. But do try to explain your type without putting down your own type. Besides, how str8 do they look when they're down on their knees? (a quote from Romanovky and Phillips' CD).

 

;-)

[Rick Munroe]

>among my friends

> (gay & straight) the straight ones are more effeminate than

>the gay guys and its not an act on either side.

 

So true for me, too. How can straight guys be masculine, anyway, when they're usually pussy-whipped?

 

>why do we have

>so little respect for our people that we look to the breeders

>as examples of perfection, esp since it's false

 

Right on, Taylor. I like your style, kid.

[Rick Munroe]

>My post made a reference to a "type", a type which most

>readers and posters here understand.

 

I'm sure most readers here understand "nigger" "hebe" and "chink". Let's use those words, too, because we all understand.

 

>I do, however, question whether this site is the

>place to have that dialogue/argument.

 

This site is exactly the place to have that discussion. Most homophobes are closeted, and we have plenty of closeted guys who either post or lurk here. But out gay guys use these expressions, too. Self-hate seems to be something that's been ingrained into gay culture & by speaking out here, we can do our part to educate our gay brothers and put an end it.

[Rick Munroe]

>I do, however, question whether this site is the

>place to have that dialogue/argument.

 

I forgot to mention that I thought this was a particularly odd thing for you to say, when you've created (and posted to others') political threads here, and even encouraged me to get more involved in those political discussions. Now, let me get this straight(acting): on a gay escort website, you think it's appropriate for you to start a thread called "Al Bore: It's time for him to go - Permanently" (12-11-02) but it's inappropriate to discuss whether or not "straight-acting" is offensive? Don't get me wrong; I like you & think you're a good guy. I just wish you'd open your eyes here instead of being defensive.

[+ Lucky]

Well, I am about as str8-acting a queen as I know, but I don't live in Chicago. (Although I hear the chiffon there is just FAB-U-lous!)

[Guest ncm2169]

Well, since this thread has been successfully hijacked, I'll chime in for the last time.

 

First, I apologize to anyone who was offended by my choice of words. Anyone here who "knows" me, knows that I do not come here to offend anyone (OK, some cutting remarks occasionally, but all in the spirit of the discourse here).

 

Second, I misspoke (mistyped?) when I said this SITE wasn't the place to have an argument over the term "str8-acting"...I should have said this THREAD wasn't the place to have it, because having that discussion would result in a hijack of my post, which, of course, is exactly what happened.

 

Third, I said earlier that "str8-acting" is a term for a "type" which many here accept and understand. I just did a quick word search for "str8-acting" and found 147 results, many (if not all) of which are contained in reviews of escorts.

 

I rest my case.

 

Now, I guess I'll resume my search for a "masculine" college-type guy in Chicago. :+

[Uncle Bill]

Now, by "masculine", do you mean "macho"? A guy doesn't have to go around punching people in the face just to be masculine, does he? I am really offended by your use of the term....

 

Just kidding (please don't attack me -- I'm not secure enough in my masculinity to take that) :+

 

Keep looking for those cute young hunks, NCM.

[+ glutes]

ncm, some folks here know what you are talking about - no need to have to defend yourself.

[Guest ncm2169]

LMAO !! }(

[Guest ncm2169]

:)