GOOD NEWS OF BRUNO GAUCHO!!!!!

[Guest 2 minute man]

Deleted message

 

No message

[LovesYng]

I can't believe the fucking cat fighting going on. If you don't like it just don't read it:+

[Guest BrunoGaucho]

>Since HooBoy is notoriously (and self-admittedly)

>Portuguese-challenged, I'll take the liberty of responding

>here:

>

>BRUNO: Você não fez nada errado. No "Deli" pode colocar

>qualquer informação geral a respeito de você e do seu site,

>como anúncios de novas fotos o mudanças de endereço. Se quer

>colocar informação detalhada a respeito das datas e destinos

>das suas viagens, seria melhor coloca-la na seção "Escort

>Travels." OK? Abração! :7

>

>(Translation: You haven't done anything wrong. In the "Deli"

>you can post any general information about yourself and your

>site, like announcements of new photos or changes of address.

>If you want to post detailed information about the dates and

>destinations of your trips, it would be better to put them in

>"Escort Travels." OK? Hugs!)

 

Ola Tri,,

 

Muitissimo obrigado pela Ajuda...

 

Eu irei colocar as datas exatas no Escort Travel...

 

Aqui apenas coloquei sobre algumas mudancas em meu site..

 

Nao pensava que ia ter tantas criticas...

 

Acredito que algumas pessoas se incomodam com o sucesso do proximo..

 

Mas o meu sucesso e divino..e nunca acabaras...

 

Beijos...

 

Bruno GAucho

[Guest Bitchboy]

Of course, I'd like to point out that I said nothing even slightly political in this post, so I don't need to be directed to take it to a political forum. However, your interest in patroling reminds me of a school crossing guard from Ephiphany of our Lord grammar school. She too was well-meaning but unequipped.

[+ glutes]

>So what is the good news ?

 

So what is the NEWS period? This is an advertisment.

[trilingual]

>>So what is the good news ?

>

>So what is the NEWS period? This is an advertisment.

 

Not exactly. This is a translation of Bruno's response in Portuguese:

 

Hi, Tri,

 

Thanks very much for your help.

 

I'll post the exact dates in Escort Travel...

 

Here I just posted some about changes in my website.

 

I never imagined I'd get so much flak.

 

I think some people just can't stand it when someone else is successful.

 

But my success comes from God, and will never end. . .

 

Kisses. . .

 

Bruno Gaucho

 

For Bruno's sake, I hope his success doesn't end, either. His self-confidence is understandable in a 20-something who has certainly been blessed in the looks and endowment department, and who has certainly stirred the juices of many readers of this site. (Most Brazilians, even escorts, are also very spirituals/religious, which also has something to do with Bruno's remarks.) Anyway, we can wait and see how things look to him when he's 50. . . Well, some of us can. By then, I'll be nodding off in my rocker at the Home for Retired Size-Queens, living on my memories. . . ;-)

[Guest Fin Fang Foom]

>But my success comes from God, and will never end. . .

 

 

(stunned silence)

[kjun]

You sarcastic (but, I must admit I laughed out loud) asshole.

 

the Cajun

[trilingual]

Although his phraseology could have been better, I think Bruno actually has demonstrated that he recognizes that his success is due to God-given gifts, i.e., his looks, body and endowment. Of course, he had to make the decision to do something with those gifts, and I'm sure he's added to them by working out and getting a fashionable haircut, but he understands perfectly well that the raw materials were not his own doing. He's been lucky, and he knows that. I consider that a mature outlook for a 20-something year old.

 

I haven't met Bruno personally, but those who have all describe him as a nice kid, so it doesn't seem that he ordinarily goes around giving attitude, which he could well do considering how much he appeals to so many people.

[+ Lucky]

"he's been lucky..."

 

Yeah, right. I wish.

[kjun]

Lucky,your fangs are showing!

 

the Cajun

[Guest YFSC]

>You seem not to have understood what this thread is about.

 

Excuse me, sir, but *YOU* are the one who seems not to have understood what this thread is about. It is about news from Bruno Gaucho - see the subject and original post - or at least it *was* until you and your cohorts hijacked it to dump on Bruno for posting his news.

 

>It's not about someone who wants to post an opinion under an

>anonymous handle, it's about someone who is claiming to be a

>specific escort and who is using this section of the board to

>make certain claims about the appearance and plans of that

>escort. Did you really not get that?

 

What the hell difference does it make if it's someone under "an anonymous handle" or someone who "is claiming to be a specific escort"?? Are you seriously claiming that anonymous handles can post but specific escorts can't??

Are you for real?

 

And why shouldn't someone be able to comment on "the appearance and plans of that escort"?? According to the official definition, this is "The Deli: An area to discuss Escorts."

Do you really not get that?

 

>I am not someone who is claiming to be a specific person and

>who started this thread for the purpose of making claims about

>myself to induce people to do business with me. See the

>difference? It's not too complicated for you to grasp, is it?

 

What does claiming to be a specific person have to do with it?? In some very different kinds of situations it might be relevant, but of what possible relevance is it here??

And Bruno did not make any "claims" about himself. He provided information - that he has new pictures on his website, that the dates of his trip to the USA are on his website, and that he has a new email address, and there is nothing else in his post. Those are not "claims" about himself.

See the difference? It's not too complicated for you to grasp, is it?

[giovoni]

Absolutely correct that we see lots of escorts updating their new information through hooboy's email. It seems that the rules for this message board allow people to post the same information on here too though. It seems that through some terrible oversite Hooboy has allowed TWO ways for escorts to convey information to clients or anyone else who is interested. I'm sure that when this terrible lapse in design is pointed out the people responsible for it will be sacked.

 

Obvioulsy certain people prefer emailing Hooboy directly when their info changes and for some UNFATHOMABLE reason prefer not to post their new information on this message board. Certain other people like to post on here.. why can't both be ok?

 

Gio in Denver

http://www.angelfire.com/co3/massagebygio

[Guest YFSC]

>>Who is vouching for him in this thread? What did anyone say

>>to vouch for him? To paraphrase, if you claim someone has,

>>show me the post. You can't, since there is none.

>

>Wrong. See post #17 by kjun.

 

No, *YOU* are wrong *again*:

...vouch verb

...intransitive senses

...1 : to give a guarantee : become surety

...2 a : to supply supporting evidence or testimony

.....b : to give personal assurance

.............................(Merriam-Webster Dictionary)

 

Neither kjun #17 nor any other kjun post nor anyone else on this thread has "vouched" for Bruno. Nobody has guaranteed him, nobody has given supporting evidence about him, and nobody has given personal assurance about him. Nobody gave assurances or testimony about how good an escort he is or anything like that.

 

Post #17, in its entirety:

...>kjun Fri Feb-28-03 06:44 PM

...>#32263, "RE: GOOD NEWS OF BRUNO GAUCHO!!!!!"

...>You're right. I have never met him. You're also right that I think

...>he's really good lookin. And, you're ritht that I would jump in

...>the bed with him if I got the chance. But, Why does he get you so

...>riled? And, why did my little joking comment about "stuff it" get

...>you so upset? He's just an escort and into pushing his wares.

...>What's so aggrivating about that?

...>

...>the Cajun

 

kjun is not providing guarantees, evidence, testimony, or personal assurances. He states up front that he has not met Bruno and then *expresses his opinion* that Bruno is good looking, which he can form on the basis of looking at Bruno's pictures and which he is entitled to, and *expresses his willingness* to "jump in the bed with him". That's all. THAT'S NOT VOUCHING FOR ANYTHING.

As someone once said, "See the difference? It's not too complicated for you to grasp, is it?"

[Guest YFSC]

>No, I am not off the mark but completely accurate. I have

>seen at least three threads about this guy in the past month

>that seem to have no other purpose but to advertise him.

>Don't lie about it.

 

I'm not lying, but maybe you are.

Please cite for us the "at least three threads about this guy in the past month" that you claim to have seen. And the threads about him certainly don't "have no other purpose but to advertise him." In this current thread he is conveying information. Is it also advertising? Sure. All posts from any escort are. But it has another purpose as well. From the results of Search, on January 4 he wrote a panicky post about how his email had been cut off, and 2 days later he posted his new email address (that's 2 months ago). Advertising? Sure. But also information for people who wanted it. And necessitated by a circumstance beyond his control. And how else could he notify this large population of clients in a hurry? Otherwise emails to his old address would have been returned and nobody would have known how to contact him. And other escorts have done the same when their emails were cut off. In December he wrote with holiday greetings and wished everyone a Happy New Year (his post and his command of English were promptly parodied in a mean-spirited way). Advertising? Yes, and so is the Christmas card you get from your insurance agent. But is it so hard to believe that he really did want to wish everyone a Happy New Year?

 

There have been many other threads about him in the past, many of which were started in order to attack him, not promote him. Threads about him have been started, among others, by Sports, Brazil Nut, trilingual, ServeUncutUncle, alanm, Fin Fang Foom, Ricardo SF, cutebuns888, and curious2000. Is Bruno to blame for "advertising" if all those people started threads about him? Or maybe you believe that they are all in cahoots with Bruno and part of a conspiracy to promote him here.

 

>>Don't bash Bruno for what *other* people did.

>

>Again, don't lie.

 

I'm not lying. And don't quote out of context. What I said before is the same as what is above, and it is *true*. My previous statement:

 

>>The truth is that the plethora of posts connected with his previous

>>visit was generated by others, predominantly by those who were

>>attacking him. And Adrian contributed more than anyone else to that

>>both in volume and by constantly keeping those threads alive with

>>his mudslinging and calling forth replies. Don't bash Bruno for what

>>*other* people did.

 

And you *are* bashing him for "advertising" and "this guy seems to do it constantly." If other people keep posting about him that's not Bruno "advertising constantly".

 

>I have said nothing about Bruno other than

>that he has been using this message board to advertise

>himself, and that is the one point on which everyone in this

>thread seems to agree. If others have been bashing him, talk

>to them, don't whine at me about it.

 

You didn't just "say" that - you accused him of it and criticized him for it. You say it with obvious strong disapproval, and you attack those who point out that Bruno has not done anything in violation of the policies of this site. And you are criticizing him for "constant" advertising posts when most of the posts were made by others beyond his control. There's no whining here. You have jumped in with the others who are trying to trash Bruno and now you are trying to protest your lily-white innocence by playing the "Who? Me?" game.

[Guest YFSC]

>Well excuse me but a day does not go by than some escort will

>send in info re change of address, new pic, new city,

>announced retirement, announced recommencing escorting etc etc

>and HooBoy puts this info at the top of the individual

>escort's entry in whatever state/country he is listed in.

 

That's right. And *also* you often find that kind of information here on the board, usually in the Deli. I have alreaady cited for you 2 instances in just the last 2-3 days (Caleb and Gerad), but you chose to ignore those. And then there is the thinly-disguised Ryan#3/BahBlackSheep. Plus numerous others.

 

Just today Franco diSantis posted a thread asking people to comment on his pics and website. And he has done that several times before in the past few months. And remember Jason Coxx and his requests for comments on his website? And several other escorts as well. How come neither you nor anyone else bashed them for that? Is all of that "not advertising"?

 

>Where, IMHO, it belongs.

 

You have told us that several times before. Why do you have to keep repeating it?

 

>The Deli is a forum to discuss escorts. The people most

>interested in discussing escorts are clients who can exchange

>experiences or opinions about certain escorts etc. Some

>escorts may want to add their comments about themselves in

>this context or about other escorts. But I still don't see how

>a thinly veiled self-promotion in the form of an announcement

>of new telephone or e-mail addresses furthers the discussion.

 

"Discussion" includes information. And even by your more restrictive definition of "discussion", you have to admit that Bruno's post has generated a lot of "discussion".

 

>This sort of stuff belongs elsewhere.

 

Yes, we know. You said that. Many times.

But now instead of expressing it as an opinion, you are stating it categorically. Who appointed *you* the arbiter of what belongs on this board?

 

And instead of just repeating your claims over and over, why don't you respond to the points in my post #35? Perhaps it is because you know they are right?

 

And I'm waiting for an answer to my question in post #37. Just to refresh your memory, here is the post:

...>...except that he is abusing the rules.

...

...And which rules are those? Perhaps you could cite them here, or

...tell us where to find them.

 

Do tell us what these "rules" are that Bruno is "abusing" and that give you the right to say "This sort of stuff belongs elsewhere." What is the policy? What is the authority? tell us where to find it.

[Guest YFSC]

>Well, HooBoy to the rescue! Look at today's review of Cole

>Davis. Cole sent in a new e-mail address. HooBoy posted it on

>his review site. It's an old review which we have seen before

>but that's the way it's done. I rest my case.}(

 

WRONG!! You are SOOOOOO wrong on so many counts!!

What you cite does not "prove" your claims at all.

Check the facts and engage brain before opening mouth (or moving fingers).

 

1. Yes, Cole Davis sent HooBoy an email with his new email address and HooBoy posted it on his review site. That doesn't prove that he couldn't or shouldn't have posted it here. There can be more than one way to disseminate the information. If you claim that it's against "the rules" to post it here, show us those alleged rules.

 

2. Cole Davis *could not* have posted it here because he is *not* a member of the Message Center, at least not under that name. He may not even know that the Message Center exists. Most people here did not find the Message Center until well after they started visiting this site. For example, I visited M4M for almost 2 years before I ever got to the Message Center. I saw the link but I never tried it because I thought it was a way for clients and escorts to leave private messages for each other. Then one day I tried it, and then became a lurker for quite a while before registering. Cole Davis is not registered, so he cannot post his information here, even if he does know about the Message Center. And if he is a member here under a different name, he can't very well use that to post it unless he wants to blow his cover. Several escorts do post here, but the vast majority of them don't and aren't registered. They are too busy and too smart to waste their time fooling around here. And all of those unregistered escorts, most or all of whom are probably also unaware of the Message Center, think that their only option is to email HooBoy. Of course, emailing HooBoy, which can be done *in addition* to posting here, has the advantage that he may change the outdated information on their reviews as well as just posting the new information at the top. So the fact that Cole Davis emailed HooBoy proves NOTHING.

 

3. You are even wrong in claiming that ">It's an old review which we have seen before >but that's the way it's done." Cole Davis has a *new* review, #34, of 3/2/03. Look. Read. Think. Then write.

 

4. Since you mention "HooBoy to the rescue":

..a. As we all know, this site is the property of HooBoy and he can do whatever he wants. He makes the rules, and he enforces them.

..b. HooBoy has deleted posts that are in violation of some rule.

..c. HooBoy has deleted posts *in this very thread*, so he is aware of it and its contents.

..d. HooBoy has told some posters *in this very thread* that their comments did not belong here in the Deli and to take their comments to a different forum.

..e. HooBoy has himself *posted* a comment on this thread, so he must have seen it and could have posted other comments.

..f. But HooBoy has *NOT* deleted Bruno's original post, nor has he commented that the post violates any rule, nor has said that the post does not belong in the Deli, nor has he criticized Bruno for posting his information here.

 

From which I conclude that HooBoy, who is the sole arbiter of what is and is not proper here, *does not* think that Bruno is violating the rules or privileges, or that this post is out of line.

 

So it looks like instead of crowing you will be eating crow.

Bon appetit!

[Guest YFSC]

>So what is the NEWS period? This is an advertisment.

 

The news is that he has new pics on his website, he has the dates of his trip to the US, and that he has new email addresses. That's news.

 

He said "new pic" but there are actually 12 of them, and they are HOTTTTT.

 

Any post from any escort is an advertisement. Yes, even Rick Munroe's witty comments. They all go to creating and maintaining an escort's image, and to keeping his name before the public. And of course they come with a link to his email and/or website at the bottom.

[woodlawn]

>>>Who is vouching for him in this thread? What did anyone

>say

>>>to vouch for him? To paraphrase, if you claim someone has,

>>>show me the post. You can't, since there is none.

>>

>>Wrong. See post #17 by kjun.

>

>No, *YOU* are wrong *again*:

>...vouch verb

>...intransitive senses

>...1 : to give a guarantee : become surety

>...2 a : to supply supporting evidence or testimony

>.....b : to give personal assurance

>.............................(Merriam-Webster Dictionary)

>

>Neither kjun #17 nor any other kjun post nor anyone else on

>this thread has "vouched" for Bruno. Nobody has guaranteed

>him, nobody has given supporting evidence about him,

 

 

Yes, they have given supporting evidence. It's shown right below. I don't know why you lie about something so obvious.

 

>

>Post #17, in its entirety:

>...>kjun Fri Feb-28-03 06:44 PM

>...>#32263, "RE: GOOD NEWS OF BRUNO GAUCHO!!!!!"

>...>You're right. I have never met him. You're also right that

>I think

>...>he's really good lookin.

 

 

And if the above does not constitute "supporting evidence" then what exactly is its meaning? The whole purpose of this website is to allow customers to share information on the appearance and other personal qualities of escorts. That is exactly what kjun is purporting to do in the quote above. The only problem, as I pointed out, is that he has no personal knowledge on which to base what he says.

 

 

>kjun is not providing guarantees, evidence, testimony, or

>personal assurances.

 

Yes, of course he is.

 

 

>"See the difference? It's not too

>complicated for you to grasp, is it?"

 

I haven't had any problem grasping the lies you've told so far. Tell some more, and we'll see if I have any problem with those.

[woodlawn]

>>No, I am not off the mark but completely accurate. I have

>>seen at least three threads about this guy in the past month

>>that seem to have no other purpose but to advertise him.

>>Don't lie about it.

>

>I'm not lying,

 

Why of course you are. It's so obvious. Why bother to deny it?

 

>but maybe you are.

>Please cite for us the "at least three threads about this guy

>in the past month" that you claim to have seen.

 

And if I take the time to do so, what's in it for me? What do you have that I want?

 

>Is it also advertising? Sure. All posts from

>any escort are.

 

My goodness, how cynical!

 

>>>Don't bash Bruno for what *other* people did.

>>

>>Again, don't lie.

 

>And you *are* bashing him for "advertising" and "this guy

>seems to do it constantly."

 

But you are saying exactly the same thing. In fact, you say that not only Bruno's posts but every post by every escort is advertising. That goes far beyond any accusation I have ever made.

 

>>I have said nothing about Bruno other than

>>that he has been using this message board to advertise

>>himself, and that is the one point on which everyone in this

>>thread seems to agree. If others have been bashing him,

>talk

>>to them, don't whine at me about it.

 

 

>You didn't just "say" that - you accused him of it and

>criticized him for it.

 

 

Again, you have said exactly the same thing about his posts and the posts of all other escorts. Are you "bashing" them as well?

 

 

You say it with obvious strong

>disapproval,

 

If you think my comments about Bruno are what passes for "strong disapproval," you've led a very sheltered life.

 

 

>and you attack those who point out that Bruno has

>not done anything in violation of the policies of this site.

 

You're a liar. I defy you to find in any of my posts in this thread any statement about the issue of whether he has violated such policies or any statement that people who deny such violations are wrong to do so.

 

 

 

>And you are criticizing him for "constant" advertising posts

>when most of the posts were made by others beyond his control.

> There's no whining here. You have jumped in with the others

>who are trying to trash Bruno and now you are trying to

>protest your lily-white innocence by playing the "Who? Me?"

>game.

 

 

I am simply pointing out the lies you have told in an attempt to throw shit at people who bring up a perfectly legitimate point about the commercial nature of this thread and of many of Bruno's other posts, a point you do not (cannot) deny.

[Luv2play]

Well, having reread the above thread, I retract my previous statements, they are no longer operative, in the words of a certain recently departed former Predidential spokesman. Perhaps I was too doctrinaire in my interpretation of the Deli rules. For instance, I have always been amused by Rick Monroe's comments, appreciate Franco Di Santos's insights, and yes, I enjoyed his sharing his recent changes to his web site with us. So I should have appreciated Bruno's update as well. So now, I'll go see his hot new pics, since these have now been drawn to my attention!

[woodlawn]

>Excuse me, sir, but *YOU* are the one who seems not to have

>understood what this thread is about. It is about news from

>Bruno Gaucho - see the subject and original post - or at least

>it *was* until you and your cohorts hijacked it to dump on

>Bruno for posting his news.

 

"Dump on him?" Please do stop telling these lies. Any statement that I have said anything about Bruno other than that he uses this message board to advertise, which is something that you yourself acknowledged, is a lie. And I have no responsibility for any remarks made by any other poster. If you have a problem with their actions (and you clearly do), take it up with them, stop whining at me about their behavior. I am not in charge of them.

 

 

>>It's not about someone who wants to post an opinion under an

>>anonymous handle, it's about someone who is claiming to be a

>>specific escort and who is using this section of the board

>to

>>make certain claims about the appearance and plans of that

>>escort. Did you really not get that?

>

>What the hell difference does it make if it's someone under

>"an anonymous handle" or someone who "is claiming to be a

>specific escort"?? Are you seriously claiming that anonymous

>handles can post but specific escorts can't??

>Are you for real?

 

 

The difference, you blithering idiot, has to do with the other poster's remark that none of us knows anything about any of those who post here. That's true of everyone EXCEPT escorts who post here under their working names, as Bruno is apparently doing. What part of that do you NOT understand?

 

>And why shouldn't someone be able to comment on "the

>appearance and plans of that escort"?? According to the

>official definition, this is "The Deli: An area to discuss

>Escorts."

>Do you really not get that?

 

 

Are you really too stupid to notice that I am NOT one of the people who have complained that the Deli section is not appropriate for Bruno's post? Perhaps a course in remedial reading would help.

 

 

>

>>I am not someone who is claiming to be a specific person and

>>who started this thread for the purpose of making claims

>about

>>myself to induce people to do business with me. See the

>>difference? It's not too complicated for you to grasp, is

>it?

 

>What does claiming to be a specific person have to do with

>it?? In some very different kinds of situations it might be

>relevant, but of what possible relevance is it here??

 

See above response. And do check out that remedial reading course.

 

 

>And Bruno did not make any "claims" about himself. He

>provided information - that he has new pictures on his

>website, that the dates of his trip to the USA are on his

>website, and that he has a new email address, and there is

>nothing else in his post. Those are not "claims" about

>himself.

>See the difference? It's not too complicated for you to

>grasp, is it?

 

Idiot boy, when a person tells us to look at pictures because those pictures are of him and will show us what he looks like, he is indeed making claims about his appearance. Do you have amnesia, or have you really never seen any of the scores and scores of complaints posted on this site from clients who were shown pictures of escorts that turned out to be pictures of someone else, or pictures that showed what they USED to look like long, long ago?

[woodlawn]

>Excuse me, sir, but *YOU* are the one who seems not to have

>understood what this thread is about. It is about news from

>Bruno Gaucho - see the subject and original post - or at least

>it *was* until you and your cohorts hijacked it to dump on

>Bruno for posting his news.

 

"Dump on him?" Please do stop telling these lies. Any statement that I have said anything about Bruno other than that he uses this message board to advertise, which is something that you yourself acknowledged, is a lie. And I have no responsibility for any remarks made by any other poster. If you have a problem with their actions (and you clearly do), take it up with them, stop whining at me about their behavior. I am not in charge of them.

 

 

>>It's not about someone who wants to post an opinion under an

>>anonymous handle, it's about someone who is claiming to be a

>>specific escort and who is using this section of the board

>to

>>make certain claims about the appearance and plans of that

>>escort. Did you really not get that?

>

>What the hell difference does it make if it's someone under

>"an anonymous handle" or someone who "is claiming to be a

>specific escort"?? Are you seriously claiming that anonymous

>handles can post but specific escorts can't??

>Are you for real?

 

 

The difference, you blithering idiot, has to do with the other poster's remark that none of us knows anything about any of those who post here. That's true of everyone EXCEPT escorts who post here under their working names, as Bruno is apparently doing. What part of that do you NOT understand?

 

>And why shouldn't someone be able to comment on "the

>appearance and plans of that escort"?? According to the

>official definition, this is "The Deli: An area to discuss

>Escorts."

>Do you really not get that?

 

 

Are you really too stupid to notice that I am NOT one of the people who have complained that the Deli section is not appropriate for Bruno's post? Perhaps a course in remedial reading would help.

 

 

>

>>I am not someone who is claiming to be a specific person and

>>who started this thread for the purpose of making claims

>about

>>myself to induce people to do business with me. See the

>>difference? It's not too complicated for you to grasp, is

>it?

 

>What does claiming to be a specific person have to do with

>it?? In some very different kinds of situations it might be

>relevant, but of what possible relevance is it here??

 

See above response. And do check out that remedial reading course.

 

 

>And Bruno did not make any "claims" about himself. He

>provided information - that he has new pictures on his

>website, that the dates of his trip to the USA are on his

>website, and that he has a new email address, and there is

>nothing else in his post. Those are not "claims" about

>himself.

>See the difference? It's not too complicated for you to

>grasp, is it?

 

Idiot boy, when a person tells us to look at pictures because those pictures are of him and will show us what he looks like, he is indeed making claims about his appearance. Do you have amnesia, or have you really never seen any of the scores and scores of complaints posted on this site from clients who were shown pictures of escorts that turned out to be pictures of someone else, or pictures that showed what they USED to look like long, long ago?

[Guest Love Bubble Butt]

>Just today Franco diSantis posted a thread asking people to

>comment on his pics and website. And he has done that several

>times before in the past few months. And remember Jason Coxx

>and his requests for comments on his website? And several

>other escorts as well. How come neither you nor anyone else

>bashed them for that? Is all of that "not advertising"?

 

I was going to point out the same thing. NO ONE ever complains at all when any of the others do it (and I don't think there is anything to complain about). But when it comes to Bruno, there are just a lot of guys who have their panties in a wad.

 

Can I give you some advice regarding Woodlawn(formerly known as Regulation)? Make your point and then stop. He'll keep coming back at you in a tit-for-tat manner until you either give up or slit your wrists. No matter how strong your position is, it's not worth it. I've also noticed that he especially likes to carry on like this with escorts. I suspect it is a way for him to get attention from attractive guys (for free).

[Guest Love Bubble Butt]

>Just today Franco diSantis posted a thread asking people to

>comment on his pics and website. And he has done that several

>times before in the past few months. And remember Jason Coxx

>and his requests for comments on his website? And several

>other escorts as well. How come neither you nor anyone else

>bashed them for that? Is all of that "not advertising"?

 

I was going to point out the same thing. NO ONE ever complains at all when any of the others do it (and I don't think there is anything to complain about). But when it comes to Bruno, there are just a lot of guys who have their panties in a wad.

 

Can I give you some advice regarding Woodlawn(formerly known as Regulation)? Make your point and then stop. He'll keep coming back at you in a tit-for-tat manner until you either give up or slit your wrists. No matter how strong your position is, it's not worth it. I've also noticed that he especially likes to carry on like this with escorts. I suspect it is a way for him to get attention from attractive guys (for free).