Today's review of Scott Adler

[Guest fukamarine]

Think there's any chance he could be Grace Adler's brother?

 

fukamarine

[Rod Hagen]

Or Stella Adler's grandson?

[Flower]

>Or Stella Adler's grandson?

 

Ok, I'll show my ignorance who is Stella and Grace Adler?

 

Flower :*

[ted]

Grace Adler - "Will & Grace" as in Adler NBC

Stella Adler - Acting coach extraordinaire, late, of NYC

 

Are you sure you're gay?

[+ Lucky]

"Are you sure you're gay?"

Well, I know I am, but I never heard of the Adlers.

[Guest NakedTony]

>"Are you sure you're gay?"

>Well, I know I am, but I never heard of the Adlers.

 

Lucky, I'm in the same boat as you and Flower. And, yes, I've been out of the closet and around the gay community for several years.

[Flower]

>Are you sure you're gay?

 

L L yeah I'm sure :9 Thanks for answering the question too

 

Flower :*

[CT Dick]

This is a test

 

STOP!

 

Before you enter another post, who was Dorothy Gale? If you can't answer that one, we'll know we have spies in our midst.

 

x(

 

Dick

[Guest ncm2169]

I've emailed back and forth with him, had SEVERAL extended IM's with him, and talked to him on the phone 3 or 4 times over the past 2 months. All were totally enjoyable. I guarantee you...this kid's NO DUMMY. IMHO the guy is trying to build a biz and is learning as he goes. Give him credit for trying new approaches to marketing. :7 I elected not to hire him during my trip to LA next week because I choose not to pay his fees. If I was a high roller, I'd prob hire him in a NY minute. :+

 

P.S. If anybody here wants some insights based on my contact with him, feel free to private message me.

[SAdler]

Deborah and I are actually quite good friends and that's where I got the name from No -- I'm not really an Adler by blood so you can stop searching the white pages for me

 

And as much as I appreciate NCM's commentary, he's really a great guy, I'd rather you contact me first and determine for yourself if my rates are too high. I really feel his post was a little unwarranted and unnecessary. But thanks anyway for the thought!

 

 

 

Scott Adler

[Guest Kalifornia]

Scott I have never seen anyone on this site have 6 reviews and only 1 reviewer notes your rate. All the others are beyond vague. Have you taken any creative writing classes?

 

Mark -Kalifornia

[Guest ncm2169]

I'm tempted to tell Scott not to look a gift horse in the mouth. I'm not sure what I said that was unnecessary or unwarranted. I didn't say his rates are too high, I simply said I chose not to pay them. :*

 

For the record, the relevant excerpt from his email to me on Sunday, July 28, 2002, in response to my initial email to him:

 

 

"Where in Los Angeles did you think you would be staying? My rates, as

mentioned on other pages and I believe HooBoy, tend to be on the higher

side. I charge by service and not by hour. Without anal, what you've

described would be $400. Me on top is $500 and you on top is $600. I

unfortunately do not swallow, just part of all my safety precautions

that I'm clean and intend on staying that way.

 

Regarding services, I assure you because the idea of by service and not

by time that I will not attempt to finish as quickly as possible. I in

fact rather enjoy meeting a client, getting to know them over a meal

first or a drink and then getting down to business After which I

like taking a nice shower and then going to a local Starbucks and

chatting some more. It's more of an experience then a business

encounter.

 

I hope that I've kept your spark of interest and look forward to hearing

from you soon. My AIM SN is S8nZWcCnSoN if you'd like to contact me

there.

 

S A"

 

 

FYI, the services I described to him for which he quoted $400 were basically heavy kissing, body contact, and mutual oral without condoms. :9

[Flower]

>I'm tempted to tell Scott not to look a gift horse in the

>mouth. I'm not sure what I said that was unnecessary or

>unwarranted. I didn't say his rates are too high, I simply

>said I chose not to pay them. :*

>

>For the record, the relevant excerpt from his email to me on

>Sunday, July 28, 2002, in response to my initial email to

>him:

 

I for one, think it highly inappropriate to publish an email that was sent to you discussing rates and services--at least you could have had the decency to eliminate his AIM SN. This kinda action will make escorts very wary of giving any details at all in their emails.

 

It was just a few weeks ago someone here was complaining that they got no answers to their emails and questions or if they did, it was evasive and NO detail. Well, this guy apparently replied to you in a detailed manner and sounds very nice and very up front--a refreshing think I might add. He more than answered your questions in a friendly and professional manner and you have the audacity to publish his email including SN, which he probably doesn't give out to everyone right off the bat. x(

 

More importantly, he discusses services for a fee, stating his fee is for a (sexual) service, which IMHO is DANGEROUS from a legal stand point (hope you are reading this Scot) for an escort to put out in the open like you have done. x(

 

Seems to me that the publication of personal email is only justified in the gravest of circumstances and is irresponsible otherwise. Just my thoughts.

 

Flower :*

[Guest NakedTony]

Flower,

 

You hit the nail on the head and I totally agree with your post! Your comments were well-said and right on.

[Guest Kalifornia]

>

> I for one, think it highly

>inappropriate to publish an email that was sent to you

>discussing rates and services--at least you could have had

>the decency to eliminate his AIM SN. This kinda action

>will make escorts very wary of giving any details at all in

>their emails.

>

>

As typical Flower has no idea what he is talking about. Yo robot his screen name is in his profile.

 

Scott Adler

Group normal

ICQ

AOL-IM S8nZwcCnSoN

Avatar Image

Gender Male

City Los Angeles

State CA

Country

Homepage

Hobby

Comment You've had the rest -- have a go with one of the best No I'm not full of myself I just LOVE that line.

 

 

Mark -Kalifornia

[Guest ncm2169]

Whoa! Hold on just a gol darn minute here. CHILL, dudes. :-)

 

I only replied to this thread in the first place to say some nice things about Scott. Yes, I did say that I chose not to pay his fee, but that hardly qualifies as a "diss", at least in my dictionary. :o

 

So far, in response, I've gotten what I might call a "whiny but still classy" kinda rebuke from Scott, and now this crap str8 from Flower's compost heap. x(

 

(BTW, Scott, if you're paying attention, none of this is really about you. You are who and what you are, you charge what you charge, and you deliver what you deliver. If you're half as smart as I think you are, you'll realize that this otherwise inane dialogue is called INK!! for Scott Adler. Remember the addage: "I don't care what they say as long as they spell my name right.") }>

 

Flower:

 

 

"I for one, think it highly inappropriate to publish an email that was sent to you discussing rates and services"

 

Well, Jesus fuck, what is this site about? Previous posters had correctly observed that his reviews left his fees...umm...open. I hardly think he was confidentially quoting me fees based solely on the fact that I promised him a 2003 Lamborghini and an apt. in Paris. ;-)

 

Plus, I refer you again to the following words:

 

"My rates, as

mentioned on other pages and I believe HooBoy,"

 

 

 

 

"you have the audacity to publish his email including SN, which he probably doesn't give out to everyone right off the bat."

 

 

Define "right off the bat." I emailed him on Sunday AM, July 28. He replied Sunday evening, July 28. It's not like he waited to give me his private digits until after we were going steady.

 

 

 

"More importantly, he discusses services for a fee, stating his fee is for a (sexual) service, which IMHO is DANGEROUS from a legal stand point (hope you are reading this Scot) for an escort to put out in the open like you have done."

 

 

Upon reflection, I wish I had edited his email more carefully, and had left out that reference. :'( I hereby publicly and VERY sincerely apologize to Scott for my lapse.

 

I also equally sincerely encourage Scott to be more careful when he composes email. After all, I didn't write his email, I only quoted it. I didn't omit the "standard disclaimer", he did.

 

Like I said last nite, guyz, the kid is learning as he goes. Who among us hasn't stumbled a time or two at that age? :7

 

Finally, and I do mean finally :+ , Scott, GO FOR IT! Be the best! You're smart enough, and you sure as hell have the personality!

 

(P.S. I hear your dick ain't bad either...and that auto-...oops, I better shut up or I'll be in trouble again). ;-)

[Flower]

>>

>As typical Flower has no idea what he is talking about. Yo

>robot his screen name is in his profile.

****

>Mark -Kalifornia

 

:7

 

Btw, sweetie, love what you did to your font color--I hear imitation is the sincerest form of compliment :+

 

Flower :*

[DaninWA]

RE: This is a test

 

Dorothy Gale???

 

Dan

[DaninWA]

RE: This is a test

 

Just kidding:-)

 

Keep your ruby slippers on.

 

Dan