Sean Armstrongs Review

[Guest Kalifornia]

Nice to see Sean receive his first review so quickly. He returned to escorting less than 3 weeks ago. The problem I find with this obviously bogus review is: the second time reviewer (his first was of Casey, what a fucking shocker) is his meeting with Sean apparently took errr takes place September 26, 2002. Today is September 8, 2002. What is wrong with this picture... I will think about it and get back to you.

 

Mark -Kalifornia

[Guest Wildcats]

RE: Sean Armstrong's Review

 

Must have been a typo -- August 26th? I was with Casey on August 16th and he was flying the following day for Houston then return to Chicago with his and Sean's stuff that same week.

[N.N.]

The reviewer says "I was a virgin" but also

says "I am very versatile. Being a bottom or

top is a spur of the moment thing for me."

[Guest Kalifornia]

This really bugs me. Such a blatant fake review on a rip off artist. The reviewer states he doesn't suck yet in his review of Casey he apparently changed his mind. He claims to be a virgin yet bottoms or tops at the spur of the moment. In Sean's review the man states he could hardly handle Sean's cock in his face, well if you aren't sucking what is it doing in your face? An escort, even Sean (a top), without condoms nearby?

 

Either this is a very well crafted review submitted by the lame duo or this guy (who reviewed Casey in April 2001) is totally fake. BTW that is 18 months between reviews, he hasn't seen any other escort in that time frame?

 

Oh what a sad state of affairs we so blantly display.

 

Mark -Kalifornia

[Guest Wildcats]

Casey is much smarter than the reviewer, if the implication is that the review came from him. I don't think I've seen Sean touch the laptop during the number of times I've had incalls with bothe of them during the SeanAndCasey days in Chicago. It's been 18 months since the last Sean review because they were out of the scene for that long a time.

[BuckyXTC]

I don't think I've seen >Sean touch the laptop during the number of times I've had >incalls with bothe of them during the SeanAndCasey days in >Chicago. It's been 18 months since the last Sean review >because they were out of the scene for that long a time.

 

Well, Sean apparently "touched the laptop" about a week ago, as his name came up as one of the new members at this forum. You can check it out here under "profiles".

[Guest BigSquirt]

It's been 18 months since the last Sean review

>because they were out of the scene for that long a time.

 

And considering that he's on the run from the law in Texas again on probation, when they catch up with him this time, it'll be a lot longer than an 18 month hiatus.

 

Of course it's a fake review...easily recognizable and reads exactly like other stuff written by Casey. Once a habitual con artist, always a habitual con artist.

 

They obviously need to bump him into the current reviews area to snag some unsuspecting clients, especially since their days are numbered.

[Guest Kalifornia]

>Casey is much smarter than the reviewer, if the implication

>is that the review came from him. I don't think I've seen

>Sean touch the laptop during the number of times I've had

>incalls with bothe of them during the SeanAndCasey days in

>Chicago. It's been 18 months since the last Sean review

>because they were out of the scene for that long a time.

 

Wildcats it has been 18 months between the man who did the review. I agree Casey seems quite intelligent, and intelligent enough to write the fake review in April 2001 and the current one on Sean. Why else would it be this reviewer only has two reviews so far apart on this site? Sean has not been escorting only a year, though he was escorting in Texas.

 

And someone is either using Seans name or he learned how to use the notebook computer. He registered on this site and has been typing away to several others. I cannot go into detail.

 

No matter what these two guys are slime, ripoff artists, con men and poor examples of what escorts should be all about.

 

I don't give a fuck ... hiring away guys. Just DON'T come back to this message center crying about them when you do get burned, oh and you will!

 

Mark -Kalifornia

[OneFinger]

>...it has been 18 months between the man who did the review.

 

Mark, I don't write a review everytime I hire an escort. I think it's entirely possible for one of "regulars" here to go 18 months between writing reviews.

 

But, I do NOT mean to imply that this the latest review of Sean is a "real" review. I find it rather suspect, too.

[alanalt]

I admit that I've been following the 'Sean and Casey' threads with a certain amount of amused interest. I do not know Sean and Casey and I'm not likely to ever hire them. I have no position on Sean and Casey except that in their pictures, they seem kinda cute (and I've not seen any critics say their pictures are inaccurate).

 

What amuses me most is when the anti-S & C brigade come out with a new thread, they are actually doing these guys a favour? 'Bad press' is much, much better than 'No press'. Furthermore, I'm sure that every time one of these threads comes up, there's some lurker out there who thinks 'Hm, wonder what all the fuss is about? Next time I'm in Chicago, I'm going to hire one of these boys and find out!'

 

Just an observation,

 

Alan

[BuckyXTC]

>What amuses me most is when the anti-S & C brigade come out

>with a new thread, they are actually doing these guys a

>favour? 'Bad press' is much, much better than 'No press'.

>Furthermore, I'm sure that every time one of these threads

>comes up, there's some lurker out there who thinks 'Hm,

>wonder what all the fuss is about? Next time I'm in

>Chicago, I'm going to hire one of these boys and find out!'

>

>Just an observation,

>

>Alan

 

Alan you're probably correct in this. Some folks who have been burned by this duo have made an effort to warn others about the perils, but there are always those who have to get stung in person. At least they can't say they didnt have fair warning.

[Guest paulr312]

I can't say that I'm surprised by how quickly conversations have turned back to Sean and Casey. I am surprised, however, how prompt Sean & Casey haters are to throw them so much free publicity. I honestly doubt that Casey would be stupid enough to write Sean's first review since he got back, especially seeing as how the reviewer posted that his only other review was for Casey. I find it quite sad and rather pathetic that so many men are so bitter that they can't wish these two well. Even if you have been "burned" by them in the past, don't you find it rather illogical to feel so much resentment towards two kids who have messed up in the past? You guys make them out to be a couple of con-artists whose only goal is to screw you over. No one wants to consider the possibility that they just messed up in the past and give them another chance. I wouldn't be so quick to predict their downfall. I had a call with both of them last week. I didn't write a review because of this exact reason. Very sad, very sad indeed.

[BuckyXTC]

Paul:

 

You seem like a very nice guy and probably more forgiving than most. Your experiences with Sean and Casey seem to be positive ones, and for that reason, that is precisely why you should write a review. Will some people question its validity? You can bank on it. Does that really matter? I don't think so. If you believe Sean and Casey deliver what they promised in your experience with them, I think you should say so via a review.

 

At the same time, remember that some folks feel they have been burned by the Dynamic Duo, and I believe they're well within their right to say so as well. In the end, relying on reviews is always a matter of judgment. Over the long haul, we've seen escorts reviewed here with glowing reviews from well-known clients at the message center who, for one reason or another, hit some major bumps in the road and went off the track. That's why many of us are skeptical about first reviews, or single reviews of an escort. It's a cold hard fact that some reviews are fake. Ever gone to a restaurant that has really nice photos of their meals on the menu, yet when the food comes out it looks nowhere near as appetizing as the photograph?

 

Since I don't live near Chicago, the chances of my hiring Sean or Casey are pretty slim, though I considered a trip out that way for that purpose better than a year ago. A friend who posts here regularly who I trust warned me away from them. Because I trust that person, I won't be inclined to hire them.

 

Your post does hint at an issue where there are significant differences of opinion here. Some have ardently declared that if a person is ever untrustworthy, you can't ever trust them to be otherwise; the old "leopards don't change their spots" argument. While I do believe most of us are creatures of habit, I wouldn't go so far as to say a change of heart and change of approach is beyond the realm of possibility. Both Sean and Casey started out in this business pretty young, and undoubtedly made some mistakes. Have they changed? I honestly don't know. Maybe they have, maybe not. Your experience was good, others not so good. Skepticism runs high in this message center, and in many instances, it is not a very "forgiving" place.

 

I hope you'll write a thorough, honest, detailed review of Sean and Casey and feel good about doing it. If others choose not to believe it, there's nothing you can do about it. But you will have the satisfaction of being "on the record".

[Guest Kalifornia]

>I can't say that I'm surprised by how quickly conversations

>have turned back to Sean and Casey.

I am surprized that the only posts you have made to this board since your recent sign up have been to do spin control for these two.

 

> I find it quite sad and

>rather pathetic that so many men are so bitter that they

>can't wish these two well.

 

Yo maybe there is a clue in the above for you. If people weren't so harmed by these two maybe you would find what you seek.

 

>Even if you have been "burned"

>by them in the past,

What a statement in itself... it's ok even if you have been burned in the past, really?

 

>don't you find it rather illogical to

>feel so much resentment towards two kids who have messed up

>in the past?

KIDS? they are men in their earlu and mid-twenties. The King Brothers are KIDS.

 

>You guys make them out to be a couple of

>con-artists whose only goal is to screw you over.

HEY how come you don';t offer your money back guarantee to make things right, or did you forget that post when I asked you to put up your cash ot shut the fuck up.

>No one

>wants to consider the possibility that they just messed up

>in the past and give them another chance.

Apparently very few if any agree with you. If they chime in now it is way after the fact and suspect.

 

> I wouldn't be so

>quick to predict their downfall. I had a call with both of

>them last week. I didn't write a review because of this

>exact reason. Very sad, very sad indeed.

 

Yu didn't write a review because they were very sad as escorts? Who is predicting these con artists downfall? People are posting their feelings just as you are.

 

A sucker is born every minute. Enjoy.

 

Mark -Kalifornia

[Guest paulr312]

>I am surprized that the only posts you have made to this board since your recent sign up have been to do spin control for these two.>

Actually, those aren't the only posts I have made since my recent sign up. And I highly doubt that anything I have to say will impact anyone's opinion on them. I am just stating mine, like everyone else.

 

Mark, I really don't think you have any logical reason to believe that Sean's review is bogus. A few minor discrepanices,that are most likely errors,that no one who was trying to pull a fast one would make, is hardly a reason to discredit the review. I'm sure if you went through each and every review as thoroughly as you go through Sean and Casey's you would find some mistakes here and there. But that's just my opnion.

[+ BenjaminNicholas]

I suppose we could always ask for a sentance-by-sentance deconstruction of the review from Fin Fang Foom... As you all know, it's considered more reliable than DNA evidence in a capitol murder case

 

 

Seriously though, if those kids want to clean up their act and try again, then so be it~ people fuck up all the time and to continue pennance would be asinine. Personally, i stand Switzerland on things considering i haven't met or personally been affected by the two.

 

 

Just remember: To err is human

 

 

 

Warmest Regards,

 

 

 

Benjamin Nicholas

Escort@ChiKindaKid.com

http://www.ChiKindaKid.com

[Guest ncm2169]

Hey alanalt (my new best friend)...LOL YUP ...you're right. The RULE is, better "bad press" than "no press at all." Applies to both Congressmen and escorts...NO diff.

 

PS Are you going to EVER acknowledge our new relationship?

[Guest ncm2169]

VERY WELL SAID Bucky, couldn't even have tried to say it better myself! Bring on the review!!

[Guest ncm2169]

Big as you are on Switzerland ;-), could you please share with us a pic of an example of an "ALP" that you might have? }>

[Chuck50]

Ben you can no longer say that as Switzerland is no longer neutral. They have joined the United Nations. Sorry about that BUt HUGs Chuck:*

[alanalt]

>Hey alanalt (my new best friend)...LOL YUP ...you're right.

>The RULE is, better "bad press" than "no press at all."

>Applies to both Congressmen and escorts...NO diff.

>

>PS Are you going to EVER acknowledge our new relationship?

 

Well, I did thank you in message 9 of your '$$ Dick ID' and I think it's still a little early for flowers ;-) !!

 

Alan

[Guest Wildcats]

"Just remember: To err is human"

.... to forgive devine.

[BuckyXTC]

>VERY WELL SAID Bucky, couldn't even have tried to say it

>better myself! Bring on the review!!

 

Oh my God! Can it be true? NCM and I agree on something?

I think I feel an earthquake coming on...............

:-)

 

Seriously, NCM, thanks for the kind words. :*

[Guest ncm2169]

Better enjoy it while it lasts, dude. Might be a while till the next time.}>

[Guest ncm2169]

Candy would be nice.