Review on today's cover boy, Keene, seem phony?

[Guest Tomcal_]

I noticed that the review on Keene, was written by someone who was a first time reviewer, he didn't fill in or know..1) hair color, 2)eye color, 3)Height or weight, 4) Dick Size! Didn't really say anything about what they did, very generic, I am surprised Hooboy let this one through. Is anyone else suspious of this review?

[marc anthony]

RE: Review on today's cover boy, Keene

 

Tomcal: Not sure why there is a discrepancy on what you see on Keen's review and what I see... but the copy I see shows all those things. Height, weight, hair/eye color, and dick size are all described. The narrative is adequate as well. ????

[Guest Thunderbuns]

RE: Review on today's cover boy, Keene

 

>Tomcal: Not sure why there is a discrepancy on what you see

>on Keen's review and what I see... but the copy I see shows

>all those things. Height, weight, hair/eye color, and dick

>size are all described. The narrative is adequate as well.

>????

 

Same here - my screen shows all the important data too.

 

Maybe there's an "economy version" out there somewhere :-)

 

Thunderbuns

[+ deej]

RE: Review on today's cover boy, Keene

 

>Maybe there's an "economy version" out there somewhere :-)

 

That's the advanced edition. ;-)

[Traveller]

RE: Review on today's cover boy, Keene

 

I believe that the original poster was talking about Keene's first review. A bit sparse in the detail dept.

 

Later.

[Guest Tomcal_]

RE: Review on today's cover boy, Keene

 

Hi Guys, just checked again and now it's all there!! the second review shown is the only one that was showing when i first looked. ....guess I do have the "economy review". Or got the late edition!! I take back this post. :+

[+ glutes]

RE: Review on today's cover boy, Keene

 

I agree with Tomcal_. There are two reviews here that don't quite make sense - and both are 'first time reviews' posted on the same date. And with only a e-ail address????