Poor Pictures

[Guest Thunderbuns]

When promoting themselves as an escort on this site - as well as other venues - the two most valuable assets for the escort are good reviews and a good picture.

 

Why do so many escorts post really poor quality, under exposed, amateurish, fuzzy pics of themselves. Professional photograpy doesn't cost all that much. The fees obtained from two appointments should be enough to have a few good pictures taken, and the increased business that he would probably receive from these efforts would more than pay for any costs. They are in business for themselves, therefore they should expect to have overhead expenses.

 

I would find myself hard pressed to hire some of these guys from the pictures they use, regardless of how glowing their reviews are.

 

Thunderbuns

[Guest Chazzz69]

>

>I would find myself hard pressed to hire some of these guys

>from the pictures they use, regardless of how glowing their

>reviews are.

>

I have to agree here. If the photo is not good then I wonder if he lives up to the description and review. I am less inclined to hire anyone who does not show a full shot of his face as well. However, I will let this slide when making up my list of pros and cons before hiring a guy.

 

If he has his own web site, then I expect that he will not only have good quality photos but also full face shot. Its also good if the site includes other poses, like with clothing. There is one guy that I hired initially because I liked the picture of him in a business suit.

 

I am to the point now that one cock picture is the same as any other. They come in all shapes and sizes cut or uncut. (Pun intended) But a full face shot is going to get me to move that guy to the top of my list.

 

Granted, there are privacy issues and a host of reasons why an escort would not want to post his face on the internet or an advertisment. At the minimum I would like to have a photo e-mailed in this cirumstance.

 

Chazzz69