'David in Seattle' response 4/15

[CT Dick]

David has had 57 reviews since January 2001. (That alone must be some kind of record.)

 

He just wrote to complain about Hoo's comment that it is unusual how many of the reviews call this guy "David in Seattle" rather than David.

 

The bigger question is why 53 of those reviews are first-timers?! (Three are second-timers and one is a third.)

 

Does this guy specialize in greenhorns, or what? I think I smell something fishy. x(

 

Dick

 

PS Why didn't FFF catch this?

[+ Unicorn]

I'm not sure why HooBoy backed down on this. It's so obvious he wrote all of those reviews. He didn't even bother to change the style much. He could have been a little wiser about it. He keeps describing his facial hair as a "soul patch." I've never heard that term before, but all his "reviewers" "spontaneously" use it.

There doesn't seem to be much logic into why he wrote all those reviews. As Hooboy said, a few good reviews are all most people are looking for. Anybody who was interested in hiring him would probably look more at the reviews than most of us did, and would easily see that he wrote them. That would turn me off even more than a negative review. It shows the guy's a liar and an idiot. Or is he just trying to make fun of this site? I wonder what the domain of most of the reviewers is...

[Guest bigTom]

I have been with "David in Seattle" and did not write review as there were so many already. I can assure you that he is not a liar. It was a very hot session and "David in Seattle" lives up to all the reviews. He was very couteous on the phone in setting up the appointment and has a very hot body as advertised.

I think that the previous response to this topic is being rather presumptuous in his conclusions. The issue of not wanting to be confused with a competitor and the use of "David in Seattle" may be somewhat trite, but to draw conclusions without ever meeting him does everyone a disservice.:o

[CT Dick]

Tom, the issue is not how good he is, it is how unusual (fishy) that he has SOOOOOO many reviews in a short time and mostly by first-timers.

 

If he really is a good escort, this kind of ridiculousness undermines his credibility.

 

Dick

[Guest jeffOH]

It certainly does appear odd that he would have more than twice as many reviews as any other escort in Seattle. That, and how most are by

1st time reviewers.

 

Who knows if David wrote some of those reviews? If he didn't live up to them, I would think he would have gotten a negative review by now.

 

It seems to me as if it's a fairly small number of clients who heard about me on this site that end up submitting reviews. I have several regular clients who discovered me here, but have had no desire to share our experience with others.

 

What's that saying, "The Truth is in the pudding"? Or something like that. ;-)

 

JEFF

jeff4men@hotmail.com

[+ Unicorn]

>I have been with "David in Seattle" and did not write review

>as there were so many already. I can assure you that he is

>not a liar.

 

Well, Mr. 4-post, I have to wonder how you know him so well that you can assure us he's not a liar. I've hired dozens of escorts, and I can assure you that some of them are good lays, but I don't know how I could possibly assure anyone that any of them is not a liar. The only people whose honesty one can vouch for are people close to us, such as certain family members, close friends, and certain co-workers. David may in fact be a great lay, and may in fact be handsome. I think it's quite obvious, though, that he's been writing his own reviews, and is therefore not terribly honest. Anybody who doesn't see that is simply being foolish.

If you think David is great, why don't you add your review. Since most of his reviews are by first-time reviewers, an established reviewer would at least add some credibility that he's at least a good lay, if not an honest one. After all, most people don't expect their escort to be Mother Theresa. Or, you wouldn't be a first-time reviewer, would you?

[Guest Fin Fang Foom]

>PS Why didn't FFF catch this?

 

I can't do ALL the heavy lifting around here, can I?

 

 

Weakly yours,

 

FFF

[Guest BareBoy]

The fact that a guy has a lot of reviews doesn't mean they're phoney. Look at the reviews Matt of London has; and I use him regularly, and he's great and deserves them all. And they're certainly not fake . . .

[Guest jeffOH]

>The fact that a guy has a lot of reviews doesn't mean

>they're phoney. Look at the reviews Matt of London has;

>and I use him regularly, and he's great and deserves them

>all. And they're certainly not fake . . .

 

Matt sounds really hot, Bareboy. But, Matt has received 14 fewer reviews than David. 43 to David's 57 reviews that he's received in

nearly 1/2 the time Matt received his. David>15 months>57 reviews and Matt>29 months>43 reviews. David appears to be quite busy. Makes me feel like a lazy hooker.;-) (Jeff>29 months>17 reviews)

 

JEFF

jeff4men@hotmail.com

[+ Unicorn]

>The fact that a guy has a lot of reviews doesn't mean

>they're phoney. Look at the reviews Matt of London has;

>and I use him regularly, and he's great and deserves them

>all. And they're certainly not fake . . .

 

Don't be silly. There's no comparison. First of all, Matt from London has reviews dating back to 1999, whereas David from Seattle has had reviews for little more than a year. Second, London is a heavily touristed city whose population I'm sure is over ten times Seattle's. Matt has many five-time+ reviewers compared to David (I actually didn't see any for David, but I wasn't about to go back and read all of David's reviews). Also, there are clearly many different people writing Matt's reviews, whereas the stylistic similarities in David's reviews are obvious. Writing "David in Seattle" under the escort's name is merely the most obvious, since that's not something a real client would likely do (have you seen any other escorts whose clients start their reviews that way?). Matt may indeed have some fakes in there, but David's are clearly mostly fakes.

[Guest JoeyHart]

Blah Blah Blah!

 

You would think you people would have something better to do than over-analyze escort reviews.

 

It's gorgeous outside...get out an enjoy it!

[FrancoDiSantisxxx]

Let He Who Is Without Sin

 

>You would think you people would have something better to do

>than over-analyze escort reviews.

>

>It's gorgeous outside...get out an enjoy it!

 

What is the point of this message board if not random, occassionally mindless, certainly over-overanalytical analysis about the life and times of escorts and their patrons? We are certainly neither solving world hunger nor are we bringing peace about world peace. Though some of seem to especially spend an inordinate amount of time discussing the merits of the gluteal mass of one certain boyfriend to Mr. Ross.

 

Besides, I have been outside today, this morning happened to be gorgeous in Los Angeles, but it has been overcast and even slightly chilly the past few days ... certainly in other parts of the country, only the Goddess -- and the Weather Channel -- know what kind of shitty weather they have been experiencing that might keep one inside. It has been raining in Seattle, for example. Perhaps THAT explains all of David's reviews. Excessively crappy, rainy weather would be likely to drive one to indoor pursuits and too much proximity to all those Microsoft millions and the Evil Empire minions/geeks with the wads to blow -- literally and figuratively -- who would otherwise not be able to find a handsome man with a "soul patch" to massage, much less fuck them. Oh, and by the way, nothing personal against geeks in general, just those who toil for Mr. Bill.

 

I am exceedingly reluctant to comment on this particular thread as a few of my reviews were by first timers but I do not necessarily believe first time reviews are that unusually, particularly once we are talking about escorts who are near or older than 30 years of age, such as David and myself. It is certainly clear that the majority of the people on this site are interested in younger men and, again certainly going withe prevailing ethos of baby smooth -- perferably "naturally" smooth at that -- skin. Again, that leaves me out and David certainly seems to have more than enough hair to be left out of the "naturally" smooth boys department at the Hoo Boy Shopping Mall. What I find interesting in his reviews is the similarities, particularly two no one else has talked about. If you page through Rick Munroe's reviews, those of Matt in Vancouver, or any other escort who has multiple "raves" in response to the standard question "HIRE AGAIN," the most common response is a simple yes. It is not common to see review after review that says "in a heart beat" or "hell yeah" or "can't hardly wait" or "counting on it" or a variant of this type of comment.

 

Another thing which makes me think that David's reviewer MUST all certainly be lonely, pocket protecting wearing, coke-bottle eyeglass using Microsoft millionaires is that nearly every single review has one or more of David's URL's to list in the reivews and they are often clearly correct. As an example of myself, I am on about 15 escort sites right now. If I were on Jeopardy and I had to list three URLs to point to the specific page for the win, I would lose badly. I can point you to every single web site but the specific URL, no. The one I can recite to people is usually my own so they need not pay AVS or other adult check fees to view images of me naked or erect -- this, of course, I can do over the telephone -- but I also like to point prospective clients to other site that have stats, comments, reviews or pricing information, such as this one or http://www.maleprime.com, as I like the client to have this information and not merely the images. If someone over the telephone asks me to send them a URL to some site like maleprime, I need to offer to email it to them and then send them the link and the URL. If someone asked me my specific page URL for American Male or Guys-For-Rent or even Endowed Escorts, I would be hard pressed to remember it and the fact that nearly all of David's reviews have a URL is interesting. This again is rarely the case for most escorts, unless they have a site of their own such as http://www.tedmatthews.com or http://www.mattsizemore.com ....

 

Finally, in his defense, I have chatted BUT never met Talvin Demachio, and he does chat and write e-mails the way his review of David is written so presumably that one and perhaps others are fully genuine.

 

Heavy lifting indeed.

[Guest Thunderbuns]

>Blah Blah Blah!

>

>You would think you people would have something better to do

>than over-analyze escort reviews.

>

>It's gorgeous outside...get out an enjoy it!

 

That's the best suggestion I've heard all week!

 

Thunderbuns