Jump to content
THIS IS A TEST/QA SITE

A Possibility...? (pics)


Guest Esc_Tracker
This topic is 8253 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I hired him about ten years ago. His escort name was Sebastian. Nice looking, but nothing special. I hired him again this past January. I didn't realize that I'd seen him before until he showed up. I hardly even remembered the session with him. Before I posted a response, I had to look up his number in an old fugues to make sure it was him. He has a nice body; more like a muscular swimmer's body, but his arms aren't as muscular as in the pics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"ML

Couple of questions. How big is his cock? When he talks, does a purth fall out? Is he interactive in the rack? Can he moon walk? Thanks.

 

Later."

 

"ML - if you hired him about 10 years ago, what would you estimate his age was at that time? Would you say the pics posted by ET are probably current, or old?

 

sd-chris"

 

 

His cock is about 7 1/2" x 5 1/5". No lisp...but not very personable. I'd guess his age to be about 34. The small face pic doesn't look recent; the others were probably taken within the last three years. There's lots of hot guys in Montreal....this one just didn't leave much of an impression on me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Esc_Tracker

Well, sad to say, I tried him and all was not well.

 

First off, the good part:

 

1. His pics are authentic, though the one of him kneeling and leaning back on his haunches is probably to most representative.

 

2. He does have a very nice and quite muscular bod (and a particularly nice munchable butt). His arms are as indicated in the pics though he was probably a bit pumped for the one of him on the stool.

 

3. He is cheap, and charged less than the agreed price when he failed to provide the agreed service.

 

4. His endowment is thick and probably quite long (but see below).

 

5. He "took charge" during our encounter, which I consider sort of sexy. I kinda get tired of escorts who only respond to your cues without sending any of their own.

 

6. He kissed.

 

Next, the less good:

 

1. His face is a little less attractive in real life. His mouth is naturally small and his chin is a tad too prominant.

 

2. He does not do anal (though my guess is he might if you offered him the standard $250 US per hour NYC rates, i.e. tripled his price). From the look of his butt hole, he has taken a few in the past. ;-)

 

3. He never got hard during our time together. This has only happened to me once before with an escort.

 

4. He jacked me off after 40 minutes and wasn't interested in staying a full hour (he claimed he had to go home to attend to something), even though we had contracted for two with a possible option for an overnight. To be fair, he shaved $20 Cdn off his $120 fee for one hour when I asked him how much I owed him.

 

Because of the negatives, I can't actually recommend him. My feel is that he is caught in a sort of career time warp with him being a "model + hustler" rather than a "model + escort". He could make *a lot* of money if he learned more about how real escorts are expected to act, used some viagra, opened that butt hole to commercial exploitation, and spent more time with his clients rather than jerking them off (in the literal sense).

 

>His cock is about 7 1/2" x 5 1/5". No lisp...but not very

>personable. I'd guess his age to be about 34. The small face

>pic doesn't look recent; the others were probably taken

>within the last three years. There's lots of hot guys in

>Montreal....this one just didn't leave much of an impression

>on me.

 

This is probably a fair assessment. I think he has tremendous potential, but I somehow doubt he will be achieving it. I may try so see again next week, just to talk to him and try to figure out what's up. Didn't have much chance to talk given the speed of our encounter, and the price of a lunch will certainly not break my bank account.

 

I hope Tampa Yankee has a better time with him if they connect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Tampa Yankee

Possibility becomes Fact

 

>I hope Tampa Yankee has a better time with him if they

>connect.

 

We connected... don't think my time was any better... if so it still left a lot wanting... :-(

 

 

>Well, sad to say, I tried him and all was not well.

>

>First off, the good part:

>

>1. His pics are authentic, though the one of him kneeling

>and leaning back on his haunches is probably to most

>representative.

>

I know it has been said before, but it is worth repeating.... he looks better than your most representative pic -- to me anyway.

 

>2. He does have a very nice and quite muscular bod (and a

>particularly nice munchable butt). His arms are as

>indicated in the pics though he was probably a bit pumped

>for the one of him on the stool.

>

I thought his bod was very good: nice arms, nice back and chest, great complexion and hair was more kempt. NICE BUTT on all counts.

 

>3. He is cheap, and charged less than the agreed price when

>he failed to provide the agreed service.

>

I agree his rates are very low and thus there is less room for complaint except possibly for time lost but it all wasn't a loss.

 

>4. His endowment is thick and probably quite long (but see

>below).

 

Very nice package if he could manage a salute.

>

>5. He "took charge" during our encounter, which I consider

>sort of sexy.

 

Agreed, he initiated a massage and was quite good at it -- probably got my money's worth there given the low fee $100 CAD roughly $63 US.

>

>6. He kissed.

>

 

Well, you did better than I... he kissed barely, as little as possible as far as I was concerned.

 

>Next, the less good:

>

>1. His face is a little less attractive in real life. His

>mouth is naturally small and his chin is a tad too

>prominant.

 

Not sure I agree... I thought he looked better than than the pics, though older. THought his face looked a little more 'squared off' than in the pics

>

>2. He does not do anal

 

Admitted that to me up front when I asked.

 

>

>3. He never got hard during our time together.

 

Ditto... not that I saw anyway.

>

>4. He jacked me off after 40 minutes and wasn't interested

>in staying a full hour (he claimed he had to go home to

>attend to something), even though we had contracted for two

>with a possible option for an overnight.

 

He did active oral after fitting me with a condom... half hearted effort. He jo'd like gangbusters it seems, although I only inpsected the aftermath.

 

To be fair, he

>shaved $20 Cdn off his $120 fee for one hour when I asked

>him how much I owed him.

 

Only asked me for the 100 -- never mentioned the other figure -- maybe because it was an incall. He has a very nicely decorated apt.

>

>Because of the negatives, I can't actually recommend him.

>My feel is that he is caught in a sort of career time warp

>with him being a "model + hustler" rather than a "model +

>escort". He could make *a lot* of money if he learned more

>about how real escorts are expected to act, used some

>viagra, opened that butt hole to commercial exploitation,

>and spent more time with his clients rather than jerking

>them off (in the literal sense).

>

Pretty much agree with this assessment... a lot of wasted potential.

 

>>His cock is about 7 1/2" x 5 1/5".

 

Nice girth was apparent. Never saw it anywhere near extended but I wouldn't be surprised if it were a real grower -- seemed a lot of potential (unrealized in my case :-( )

 

No lisp...but not very

>>personable.

 

Agreed. I found him most personable afterward. He seemed to warm up a little, reveal a little about himself, ask about me and I almost got the impression he even might like to see me again although his life clearly is not hanging by this thread. :-) He is wrapped up in his life and escorting is simply a necessary inconvenience to pay rent, IMHO.

 

I'd guess his age to be about 34.

 

Agreed.

 

 

The small face

>>pic doesn't look recent; the others were probably taken

>>within the last three years. There's lots of hot guys in

>>Montreal....this one just didn't leave much of an impression

>>on me.

>

 

Agreed. The weekend was very far from a bust though -- two out of three were great or better }> , and then #3 was only $100 CAD for a good massage by a great looking if not too interactive nude guy. Then there were the dancing boys... so MANY boys so little time -- more later. ;-)

 

>This is probably a fair assessment. I think he has

>tremendous potential, but I somehow doubt he will be

>achieving it.

 

Agreed... the motivation is simply not there IMHO.

 

I may try so see again next week, just to

>talk to him and try to figure out what's up.

 

Good luck.

 

:-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RE: Possibility becomes Fact

 

ET and TY,

 

Thanks very much for the reviews. IYHOs, would he be more amenable to topping? Seems when you described his antipathy towards anal, you were refering to him being a bottom. Did I get that correctly?

 

Still, sounds like if he can't get it up, he won't make much of a top. Pity - sometimes I really want a gallic stud to set me right.

 

Thanks for checking it out for us. Very valuable info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Tampa Yankee

RE: Possibility becomes Fact

 

>Seems when you described his antipathy

>towards anal, you were refering to him being a bottom. Did I

>get that correctly?

 

When I asked about anal I didn't mention flavors... he simply was not interested in the subject.

 

I believe the pattern of no anal, oral with condom, and limited kissing (essentially wo tongue) is consistent with hyper concern about 'health issues'. Might be different once he knows you, but I don' know that to be the case and Iwill not pursue to find out -- to many fish in the sea. ;-)

 

>Still, sounds like if he can't get it up, he won't make much

>of a top.

 

LOL :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...