Quality escorts that charge under $200 hourly

[Guest curious]

Given all the recent (sometimes emotional) discussion about rates, I would like to approach the subject from a different (and hopefully less confrontational) angle. Would love to hear from some of the quality guys out there (and apparently so do some of the other posters on this site) who charge in the midrange.

 

Thanks:-)

[Guest chaz49wm]

Well I can tell you about one who is a TOP NOTCH that is VegasBoy Dave. His is 180.00 an hour and worth every penny of it. Good reviews and good times and voted by us as one of the TOP TEN. HE is in my TOP TWO. HUGS try him out you wont be sorry. And you may get hooked on Vegas as well. HUGS CHuck:P

[trilingual]

Tom Hung Dad in San Francisco has good reviews and charges $120. Rio's Ernani also charges less than $200, and will be touring the U.S. in May. . . Others may come to mind!

[Trixie]

Well, you are a peacemaker, aren't you. I have to say, as far as quality escorts go, Devon of SF and Jeff Ohio are two I'd hire any day! Simply because they took part in the discussion, with wit and charm. Obviously, they care about what their clients feel, or they wouldn't be posting here. You boys are at the top of your profession! Y'all may not have agreed with what I had to say, but I can say you came through it all with a great amout of dignity and grace. Both you boys have won my hearts, and other areas of my body. (And, they are both escorts who price reasonably and obviously work hard for the money. They are men I'd gladly hire.)

Another escort I'd like to plug is Trevor Hobbs (trevorhobbs69@hotmail.com...I think)

Trevor is one of the sweetest men I've met in a while, knows the value of HAGGLING, is sexy as all get out, and doesn't charge an arm and a leg. Trevor unfortunately doesn't look in on this site, and has only been reviewed once. But he is one of SF's and the world's best kept secrets!

In conclusion, let me say that YES, I met to rile up some emotions by my posts. And I'm impressed by how many johns came to their escorts' defense! Obviously some of the 'scorts out there have left their mark, and partly I chalk that up to the fact that we are all, more or less, "weak in the face of beauty" (see Devon's personal diary for more on this). But also, let's face it...sexual gratification is not a luxury, as some dimwits have postulated. It is a necessity. And not all of us can get what we want through conventional means. If that were not true, there would be no escorts.

Escorts provide a valuable service... I'd be a mess without them. However, that does not justify the grandiose pricing that some escorts try to charge. And I must agree, only time will tell whether those who try to charge exhorbitant rates will succeed or not. certainly I suppose, the glamour boys have their audience. But those boys have not really ever caught my attention...it's the true men, the real workers that I will hire.

Now... if all of you will direct your attention to my post entitled "Cutting a scene short" (no offense to those uncircumsised escorts out there.), I will reveal a bit more about Trixie, the escort scene, and why I fret so about value I'm getting for my dollar.

[Guest tmbg]

Mario and Adam in Las Vegas

Nick in San Francisco

Buddy Jones in Orlando

Tommy in San Diego

Jason Croft in Los Angeles

 

 

Cheers! Ritchie

[Guest BareBoy]

In my experience you can have a wonderful escort for %75 and a rotton one for $500 - luck is the word I'm looking for! One of the answers must be a gay brothel, where at least you get to see the guy before you hire him . . . one day let's hope the US joins Europe in that respect!

[Candyman]

The best buy on the east coast is Premier Escorts in Philadelphia. A great selection of guys and it's still just $150. The owner Nick and Tim and Scott who do the bookings do their best to make sure that everyone is happy. My personal favorites there in no paticular order are: Mario, Tyler, Brandon, Neil. Good luck and have fun.

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

Gabe in St Louis ($150) -- GREAT!! and he travels so be on the watch.

 

Eric in Tampa (<$150) always a great time -- see review,

 

"Bimmer Boy" <bmw_k1c@yahoo.com> in Boston ($150)

tried once, nice guy -- good time, blond preppy financial type (30), really a top so no repeat for me. (Not sure if the is still in the business.)

 

Jasen Rhodes NYC used to be $175 don't know about now -- see review.

 

Canada is LOADED with them. Vancouver and Toronto for sure -- you have got to love that Canadian exchange rate. :-)

[Guest Tim_TX]

If you come to the DALLAS/FORT WORTH area I have a half dozen guys that range from $125 and hour up to 225 an hour.

[hotmale at hotmail]

Depends on what exactly you're looking for, but my favorites are...

 

Mikel (Atlanta) $150 - WOOF! Very masculine (muscles, tattoos, hairy). Think Stone Cold Steve Austin. He's about to do some Titan videos. Get him before he gets popular.

 

Michael (Columbus) $150 - Nice build, long dick, verbal, and TALL! Shoots a nice load if you let him fuck you for as long as he wants.

 

Buddy Jones (Orlando) $150 - Awesome body, big uncut dick, and NO attitude. He shot while I was fucking him. YUMMY!

 

Ryan Holmes (Ft. Lauderdale) $160 (incalls only, $200 for out) - BIG dick. Call him only if you're ready to be pounded - he does not go slow.

 

Tom Hung Dad (San Francisco) $120 - older, but wiser. That dick is AMAZING! And he'll include a decent massage if you ask.

 

Have fun!!!

 

:9

 

By the way, it's my experience now that $200 is the mid-range. $150 is on the low end and you may be gambling with guys that are ripoffs or don't live up to expectations. The guys I mentioned above are first rate.

[langster]

I have paid as high as $300 an hour for some escorts but the ones that I have really enjoyed the most and found to be more accommodating and more into pleasing me are the ones that charge less than $200 a hour. My favorite three are BuddyJones/Orlando(will be here this weekend)$150hr & $500 overnight, SmallTownJohn $175hr, and my newly found hottie Rocky/Dallas $150hr, read my review on him Thursday, 2/22. Maybe being in the southern market has a little to do with the less expensive hourly rates but I'd put these men up against any West coast boys or in the East any day!

[Guest seraph250]

>partly I chalk

>that up to the fact that we are all, more or less, "weak in

>the face of beauty"

 

I would appreciate it if you would stop claiming that you know what "we all" think or feel. You did this in a previous post that completely mischaracterized what several people, including me, had said in the thread on pricing you started. Now you're doing it again. Maybe you can be mesmerized by someone's looks into making a bad deal. That is not true of everyone, and you should stop saying that it is. Please speak for yourself.

 

 

>But also, let's face it...sexual gratification is

>not a luxury, as some dimwits have postulated.

 

I am not sure that anyone really said that. What I believe people said is that hiring escorts is a luxury. There's an important difference between the two statements.

[Trixie]

Goodness, Seraph! I certainly didn't mean offend you. But really I'm only posting here at all for the FUN of it.. this isn't exactly a weighty dialogue over issues of grave importance. For me, anyway (I wouldn't want to presume how you think or feel on the subject).

I might add that I am free to interpret the posts of others in any manner I please, and react, should I wish to do so, accordingly.

Certainly I feel that you've interpreted my post quite differently than the spirit in which it was written. You're welcome to do so. This is, after all, a board of opinions.

Anyway, Seraph, I'm sure you're just feeling a little out of sorts, that's all. WE ALL have bad days, don't WE!

[Guest seraph250]

>Goodness, Seraph! I certainly didn't mean offend you. But

>really I'm only posting here at all for the FUN of it.. this

>isn't exactly a weighty dialogue over issues of grave

>importance.

 

Not to me, but didn't you say earlier that you consider sex a necessity and that without escorts you would be a mess? That doesn't sound as though you consider the issue UNimportant.

 

 

>I might add that I am free to interpret the posts of others

>in any manner I please, and react, should I wish to do so,

>accordingly.

 

No, actually you're not free to do that. You're not free to pretend that you speak for other people here or to claim that other people said things on the board they didn't say. Some of us don't like that.

 

>Certainly I feel that you've interpreted my post quite

>differently than the spirit in which it was written.

 

I wouldn't know (or care) anything about the spirit of your posts. I can see the words, though.

 

>You're

>welcome to do so. This is, after all, a board of opinions.

>Anyway, Seraph, I'm sure you're just feeling a little out of

>sorts, that's all. WE ALL have bad days, don't WE!

 

No matter what sort of day I am having I still will not let you pretend that you speak for me.

[Trixie]

Very, very tedious, Seraph.

This topic was supposed to be about good escorts that charge less than $200 per hour. Not only did you not address the topic, but you seem to post here merely to pick my posts apart, looking for inconsistencies. Well in the words of Maude (as in "Harold and..."), "Consistency is not really a human trait." And I am merrily human. I don't really care if something i post disagrees with a previous monologue, because I am a different person at different times. And whether this topic is important or UNimportant to me... yes, escorts feature in my life. The good men i've met and the pleasure they've given mean alot to me. Maybe not more than $200 worth, but alot, nonetheless. But, I do not take this aspect of my life all that seriously. The Universe has handed me a big ol' joke with this fetish of mine, and I'd like to try to have a sense of humor about it.

"I wouldn't know or care anything about the spirit of your posts. I can see the words though."

There's a big difference between seeing and comprehending. Certainly you know that.

"No, actually you are not free to do that, you're not free to to pretend to speak for other people."

I've never pretended to speak for you or anyone else. Have I ever said "And this goes for Seraph as well!"? The line you quoted, "We are all are weak in the face of beauty," is a well-known concept describing the human condition. We've all (except Seraph) been led by the nose by our desires from time to time. By "We All" I refer to humanity in general, not each specific individual. OK, my uptight Angel?

I realize that this is a privately owned forum by the way, and that there are mediators present, charged with watching the posts. And you are not one of them, Seraph. THEY have not deleted nor edited any of my posts, so apparently I AM free to interpret other posts as I call them.

Now... I'm bored with you, Seraph. You may have a rapier-sharp mind, but a far as I can see, you haven't the heart to know how to use it. Therefore, I shall not acknowledge your retorts any further.

[Guest Thunderbuns]

Let the games begin!

 

It's been sooo boring on here of late :-)

 

Thunderbuns

[Guest regulation]

>"No, actually you are not free to do that, you're not free

>to to pretend to speak for other people."

>I've never pretended to speak for you or anyone else. Have

>I ever said "And this goes for Seraph as well!"?

 

As a matter of fact, you have. In the second thread you started on this subject, you claimed that all clients who had responded in your first thread had taken a certain position. Seraph is one of those who responded to your first thread and he did not take the position you claimed. You not only pretended to speak for him, you mischaracterized what he had said. I can understand why he would find that annoying. I always find it annoying when people mischaracterize what I say.

 

 

>The line

>you quoted, "We are all are weak in the face of beauty," is

>a well-known concept describing the human condition. We've

>all (except Seraph) been led by the nose by our desires from

>time to time. By "We All" I refer to humanity in general,

>not each specific individual. OK, my uptight Angel?

 

Uptight? Isn't it possible for you to disagree with someone without making personal remarks about him?

 

>I realize that this is a privately owned forum by the way,

>and that there are mediators present, charged with watching

>the posts. And you are not one of them, Seraph. THEY have

>not deleted nor edited any of my posts, so apparently I AM

>free to interpret other posts as I call them.

 

Yes and no. In a sense, you are free to go up to the next person you see on the street and stab him in the chest with a knife. But the result of that action will be that your fellow citizens will treat you somewhat differently than they otherwise would. And it's the same here. You will find that when you deliberately do things that, in your words, "rile up" other members of the site, some of them will respond by scrutinizing every word of your posts and finding statements you made that contain, er, "inconsistencies" as Donnie and seraph have done. They are free to do so. If you don't like that, you should make more of an effort to avoid "riling up" people here.

 

>Therefore, I shall not

>acknowledge your retorts any further.

 

If you're making a list of people whose posts you won't acknowledge, would you please add my name? Thanks.

[jacobno]

I think it really depends on location. Given the south's lower cost of living/wages I have to keep my rate at 150$. I could probably raise it to 200$, but would risk losing out on a few calls that would go to the lower priced. However, if I were to move to a larger/more affluent city I could proabably get away with the 200 easily, not to say that I would raise it.

 

It's all economics.

Jake