Brian Young on MTV - Poor Excuse for an Escort

[Guest escortlooker2]

I've read the glowing reviews here of little Brian Young's performance on MTV last night. As a man whose been hiring some of the best escorts in the world for many years, I thought this young man was a poor representative of the best and hottest America has to offer.

 

I'm sorry, but you would have to pay ME to have sex with him.

 

He has no body whatsoever, a poor complextion and is effeminate to boot. Add to this his condescending attitude and full of himself demeanor and you have a poor excuse for an escort.

 

Perhaps he is good in bed...but why couldn't we have had Max Grand, Rick Munroe, Derek Ross, or some other real masculine hunk speak for the male escort industry?

 

I know all hell will break loose with this post - but please - I think I'm expressing what a lot of other men felt and are too afraid to say out loud.x(

 

I don't know where he flys to "20-25 days each month" but it certainly isn't into the bed of any real escort connoisseurs.

I've seen hotter guys on Santa Monica Blvd, the Port Authority Bus Station and at the Gaiety every weekend.

[thgbmi]

what is it that motivates someone to join a forum that they have never signed on to before, just to be critical of someone else--?whatever happenned to the old adage live and let live or if you can't say something positive don't say anything?. I don't know Brian Young at all, but he does have quite a number of positive reviews, and several of them are written by guys that are pretty well established as contributors to this site---what contribution is made by the party that posted this item? i guess he wants us all to know that he knows of many escorts that he believes would be better examples of the male escort that should represent the male whore industry. Now we are all supposed to clap? Disgusting!!!

[phage]

Rather than dissect the poster’s motives…I’d point out that it probably just boils down to whether you get off on twinks or not. I’m not a lover of sweet, sugary things, so he isn’t anyone I would pursue, but I can see where the twinky lovers are coming from. You also have to give the boy props for appearing on a national (albeit MTV) show, full-faced, to tell the world he is a full-time prostitute. It takes balls to tweak the noses of both the police and the IRS.

 

That said…I would have loved to see one of the serious studs up there, but it is MTV after all.

[ready4boi]

I couldn't disagree with the individual who posted this more. I thought the escort MTV chose was an IDEAL representation. I couldn't see one of the guys who are strictly trade in this industry pouring their guts out for MTV like that although it would probably be more fascinating to know why they are in the business when many actually don't even really like guys. This escort was openly gay and obviously very comfortable with not only being gay but also an escort. Obviously many of the ones who aren't wouldn't have the guts to out themselves as an escort on national TV shocking family and lovers who probably have no idea. AS someone who works in the entertainment industry, I know the intellectuals at MTV (believe it or not they do have some working there) had particular standards when producing this particular news show and wanted people who could come across as regular every-day guys and gals you'd never know were actually prostitutes.

[Guest jizzdepapi]

are we talking about the same Bryan Young from San Antonio, TX who is reviewed on this site?

 

i don't go for twinks so wasn't familiar with Bryan. checking his reviews, he has a beautiful pic and 32 reviews, all (!!!) of them positive.

 

i think your comments are way offbase and wonder if you are so critical of all of the people you encounter. also, what is your issue with effeminate men? after all, they were the ones who fought off the cops at Stonewall so I think we all owe them some thanks.

 

hope you learn something from responses to your post and didn't come out here just to flame.

 

best,

jizzdepapi

[Guest Thunderbuns]

>are we talking about the same Bryan Young from San Antonio,

>TX who is reviewed on this site?

>

>i don't go for twinks so wasn't familiar with Bryan.

 

I don't normally go for twinks but I must admit - I sure wouldn't kick this one out of bed. Isn't he a bit too old to fall into the twink category. How about "Hunk in Training"?

 

Thunderbuns

[Guest jizzdepapi]

true, thunderbuns; here's a twink.

 

http://zipman108.freeyellow.com/gal2/Jeremy14yo.jpg

 

enjoy,

jizz

[sdg]

Hey don't hold back. I mean I guess Bryan is just an escort. But he is also a person with feelings and I think you could have gotten your point across without so much emphasis on tearing this cute kid apart.

[phage]

Now Jizz...let's get our categories right. Isn't this a young jock or maybe a "pup"? Isn't there more to being a twink than just being at or below the drinking age? They aren't allowed to have all that muscle.

 

Marc Anthony…we need a ruling.

[Guest jizzdepapi]

twink or pup?

 

nope; he's a twink.

 

here's a pup:

 

http://zipman108.freeyellow.com/gal16/16-05.jpg

[marc anthony]

I have been with Bryan, and he is a beautiful boy. I thought his performance on the MTV show was both elegant and courageous. I really don't know how many other escorts with family, friends, and college classmates would do what he did for the good of the profession.

 

He intends to be an art dealer... but the best piece of art that he will ever deal is the one he has been dealing these past few years.

 

Criticize him if you want... leave him to me and others. That is fine.

[guyinsf]

I found it interesting that neither of the women they chose was particularly attractive (to me, anyway, in terms of what I find attractive about women). My guess is that MTV wanted the following qualities: (a) young -- that is their audience demographic after all; (b) articulate; and © bold. They obviously were not looking for the stereotypically "prettiest" or "most buff" escorts. I don't know how they located the escorts they featured, but my guess is that most escorts, if approached, would not have wanted to have been featured on this program.

 

As far as how he appeared on MTV, I did not find Bryan particularly attractive (physically or personally), but I could see how others would. Different people obviously have different tastes.

 

So while I may share some of the original poster's feelings about not being interested in Bryan, I would not say that it was a mistake for MTV to choose him or that he is a "poor excuse for an escort". He obviously makes his clients happy, and that's what matters.

 

If you want to see some REALLY scary working boys/men, watch "101 Rentboys"!

[+ Unicorn]

>what is it that motivates someone to join a forum that they

>have never signed on to before, just to be critical of

>someone else--?

 

I suspect the originator of this thread is a long-time poster who wishes to remain anonymous...

[ready4boi]

101 Rent Boys was produced by the same producers who brought us "The RuPaul Show". Enough said. :'(

[DaninWA]

Brian Young was okay, but his client( Michael?) was gorgeous!

[Guest regulation]

To those who bashed the thread author for giving his opinion of an escort, what the hell do you think this site is for?

 

People who have had little to do with escorts assume they are far more attractive than the average person. But none of the escorts shown on the MTV program conforms to mainstream ideas of male or female beauty. The male escort is a skinny, nerdy-looking nelly guy with a bad haircut. I have had something to do with the fashion industry and I know that if he showed up at a legitimate modeling agency and tried to get repped he would be laughed out the door. The females were very plain -- what we used to call "dogs" when I was younger. I can understand why people who thought all escorts are gorgeous would be puzzled and disappointed by the ones shown on the program.

 

I am not so sure that the male escort is not truly "representative," however. Many of the escorts reviewed on this site are not particularly attractive in my opinion. I assume they get hired by people whose tastes run to something other than the classically handsome -- or who are just very, very desperate.

[Guest jizzdepapi]

the eye of the beholder?

 

hi reggie:

 

surprised you would share some of the same narrow-minded hangups as escortlooker2.

 

>his opinion of an escort...

he didn't. he bashed someone he had never hired and also effeminent men, to boot.

 

>assume they are far more attractive than the average person... skinny, nerdy-looking nelly guy...

 

thin, lanky, boyish--sought-after qualities in male escorting??

 

>with a bad haircut...

how intelligent is this poster? can he see beyond a bad haircut? fire MTV makeup artists maybe?

 

>legitimate modeling agency... laughed out the door...

probably true for many of the beauties (yup; there are many!) reviewed on this site. note that two of the pics below are taken from commercial sites and i hope bryan was paid for their use.

 

>The females were very plain--what we used to call "dogs"

undoubtedly, escortlooker has the same vocabulary. i, for one, call the animal that barks a "dog." if an escort doesn't appeal to me, i just wish him well and move on.

 

>people who thought all escorts are gorgeous would be puzzled and disappointed...

puzzled people might post an objective question about someone's appearance or their beauty "quotient;" bashers just bash.

 

>people whose tastes run to something other than the classically handsome--or who are just very, very desperate...

people who find beauty in a goddess-created body, not necessarily featured in GQ, are desperate?

 

now, i'll just let a few pics speak for themselves about this ravishing boy-beauty. please search hard for pimples on that luscious, sun-kissed olive complexion. the last pic proves Bryan knows what to do on a bad-hair day; MTV should take a lesson.

 

http://www.male4malescorts.com/images/bryanyoungsa08-06-01.jpg

 

http://www.gaysexugas.net/bryan_y/cover3.jpg

 

http://www.gaysexugas.net/bryan_y/content/set2/x001.jpg

 

best,

jizz

[Guest wetmouth]

>As far as how he appeared on MTV, I did not find Bryan

>particularly attractive (physically or personally), but I

>could see how others would. Different people obviously have

>different tastes.

>

>So while I may share some of the original poster's feelings

>about not being interested in Bryan, I would not say that it

>was a mistake for MTV to choose him or that he is a "poor

>excuse for an escort". He obviously makes his clients

>happy, and that's what matters.

>

>If you want to see some REALLY scary working boys/men, watch

>"101 Rentboys"!

 

Well stated...based on all of the positive response I thought I may have been alone in thinking that Brian Young was a perculiar choice. I thought the guy from Survivor was a far more interesting "snap Queen" than Brian. Not that I'm looking for depth or insight from an escort, but I was hoping to understand more about what lead him down this road. MTV indicated that statistics show that 80 to 90% of the women who escort have been sexully abused. We didn't get this kind of background with Brian. His transformation occured based on a trip to Amerserdam and his fondness for Neimun Marcus. At the end of the day his piece, for me, was sad. Particularily the arrest and what came off to me as flase brovado and a detached bathos. I was thrilled that MTV chose to profile a male escort as explicityly as it did...but alas I will not be purchasing Brian a plane ticket any time soon.

 

I also found "101 Rentboys" very interesting.

[Guest Bitchboy]

RE: the eye of the beholder?

 

As is often the case, people who are anonymous and have nothing to lose, take pot shots at people far more successful and sought after than themselves. Nothing really new here. As for myself, I'm not a twink lover, but I learned a long time ago that it isn't couth to attack in a public way people because you don't like their physical presentation. Ideas are a different story, of course. There are ways to get a point made without crossing that thin line that separates honest criticism and mean-spirited contempt. That, of course, requires thought, and it's easier to hurt someone than really think about them. I venture to say a lot of the people attacking this guy's look would not place high in a beauty paegant.

[Guest regulation]

RE: the eye of the beholder?

 

>hi reggie:

>

>surprised you would share some of the same narrow-minded

>hangups as escortlooker2.

 

I know you like to characterize everything in political terms, but prostitution is a business, not a crusade. Saying that you don't like the looks of a professional escort is no different than saying you don't like the look of the new VW beetle. The thread author has as much right to his opinion of the product as you do to yours. As Bryan said on the program, he is selling himself.

 

>>his opinion of an escort...

>he didn't. he bashed someone he had never hired and also

>effeminent men, to boot.

 

He gave his opinion of the guy's looks and mannerisms after seeing a program in which those looks and mannerisms were displayed. I see nothing unreasonable about that.

 

As for bashing effeminate men, that seems quite common. Have you looked at the personals in a gay publication lately?

 

>thin, lanky, boyish--sought-after qualities in male

>escorting??

 

They obviously are not sought after by some clients. If that were not so how could people like Rick and Rod make a living?

 

>>with a bad haircut...

>how intelligent is this poster? can he see beyond a bad

>haircut? fire MTV makeup artists maybe?

 

Why does a customer need to "see beyond" how the escort presents himself? Isn't that the escort's responsibility?

 

 

>>legitimate modeling agency... laughed out the door...

>probably true for many of the beauties (yup; there are

>many!) reviewed on this site.

 

That's probably why some of them are escorting rather than modeling.

 

>note that two of the pics

>below are taken from commercial sites

 

So?

 

>>The females were very plain--what we used to call "dogs"

>undoubtedly, escortlooker has the same vocabulary. i, for

>one, call the animal that barks a "dog." if an escort

>doesn't appeal to me, i just wish him well and move on.

 

 

So who's stopping you? You do whatever seems appropriate to you and let the rest of us do the same, that sound fair to you? It does to me.

 

>>people who thought all escorts are gorgeous would be puzzled and disappointed...

>puzzled people might post an objective question about

>someone's appearance or their beauty "quotient;" bashers

>just bash.

 

Give us a few examples of such "objective questions."

 

>>people whose tastes run to something other than the classically handsome--or who are just very, very desperate...

>people who find beauty in a goddess-created body, not

>necessarily featured in GQ, are desperate?

 

I guess it depends on their options, right? Are there a huge number of gay escorts to choose from in San Antonio?

 

>now, i'll just let a few pics speak for themselves about

>this ravishing boy-beauty. please search hard for pimples on

>that luscious, sun-kissed olive complexion. the last pic

>proves Bryan knows what to do on a bad-hair day; MTV should

>take a lesson.

 

I'm afraid he's aged a bit since those were taken. Nevertheless, I never said it was impossible for anyone to find him attractive. There may be a vast number of people who are turned on by a younger version of David Spade. Not me, though.

[Guest Derrick]

I agree, it took elephantitis of the balls to get up and

do what he did, but man those IRS audits and grand jury hearings will be something else that the MTV producers should think of airing

[Guest jizzdepapi]

RE: the eye of the beholder?

 

dear reggie:

 

i will leave composition of a detailed retort to any interested poster more clever than i.

 

suffice it to say that i would never refer to any woman--behind her back or in person--as a "dog" nor would i post a needlessly hurtful post bashing an accomplished escort when i could have started a post simply stating the kind of escort that turned me on. just the way i was raised, i guess; i don't think it's politics.

 

best,

jizzdepapi

[Guest albinorat]

RE: the eye of the beholder?

 

>suffice it to say that i would never refer to any

>woman--behind her back or in person--as a "dog" nor would i

>post a needlessly hurtful post bashing an accomplished

>escort when i could have started a post simply stating the

>kind of escort that turned me on.<

 

Good for you, jizz, and thanx for the pix. I thought the list of the original poster curious. Could one of "his" bois be the same as he?

 

I like butcher twinks than Mr. Young appeared to be. But that is my taste. I respected him a lot.

 

One point that might be made is that sex is the most subjective activity humans engage in. I don't find a need to judge or dismiss people because they have very different "buttons" than I do.

 

I know gay men for whom cock size and hardness is 80% and who don't expect to look at the face, and others who care mostly about the face and smile.

 

I know men who will forgive a lot for beautiful feet. And others who would never look at someone's feet.

 

I couldn't imagine being fisted, but obviously plenty of people love that and a % love ONLY that.

 

I like a lot of men as people who range in age from 30-80, some queens, others not. But if I'm going to pay for sex I want someone who looks early 20's and can at least act on the butch side. That's MY fantasy. But one of my closest friends hired a 50+ escort in San Francisco and spent most of three days with him. The escort had a big dick for sure but that was it as far as I could see. My friend was in heaven not only from the dick and the skill but from what he perceived as the person, which is very important to him.

 

We are all entitled to our wishes and if you're going to pay go for it. And I am glad you are here jizz, because I have been surprised this time around at how much contempt there is here for escorts. I applaud anybody who is sincere, up front, brave and good at what he does like Mr. Young. Whether I'd hire him is beside the point.

 

Al

[Guest regulation]

RE: the eye of the beholder?

 

>dear reggie:

>

>i will leave composition of a detailed retort to any

>interested poster more clever than i.

 

 

Madonn! We both know there is no poster cleverer than you, j. :-)

 

>suffice it to say that i would never refer to any

>woman--behind her back or in person--as a "dog" nor would i

>post a needlessly hurtful post bashing an accomplished

>escort when i could have started a post simply stating the

>kind of escort that turned me on. just the way i was raised,

>i guess; i don't think it's politics.

 

Good for you, j. It's remarkable to meet someone who believes in political correctness to such an extent that he insists on it even in a discussion of the physical qualities of prostitutes. This conversation has definitely broadened my horizons. Thanks.

[SoCal]

I've never met Bryan myself, but he is on a very short list of escorts I want to meet. So I watched the documentary with interest, and I thought he looked great! I guess it's just a matter of personal preference - if you like hairy/beefy/leather/daddy/etc. types than Bryan sure is NOT it. But he does fulfill a look and a fantasy that many, many of us have. And by all accounts and reviews he does it with honesty, style, and class.

 

I still hope to meet him!