DC Escorts who bottom

[DaninWA]

>Time to break out that salt shaker again.

>

>***SHAKE, SHAKE, SHAKE***

 

That one went right over my head. What did you mean by that comment?

 

Dan

[buckguy]

Aaron,

 

I'm sorry if you don't think it's nice to question reviews that are mostly 1st timers or from the same person. It's precisely because clinets don't know the escorts being reviewed that they get skeptical and as this site has gotten more popular, both the skepticicism and the grounds for it has increased. Of course, sometimes, escorts are put in the position where they rightfully make us suspicious of the motives or representativeness of a bad review---ther seems to be what the "salt shaker" remark was about, above.

 

OTOH, it's greta to have escorts as well as clients posting and I hope you participate more.

[AaronScottDC]

Hey Buck,

 

I completely understand where you are coming from. It is certainly reasonable to be skeptical of new escorts with only a few reviews from new clients. I have only been "working" since last May, so I haven't racked up a lot of reviews yet. A few of my clients have expressed an interest in writing them, but they haven't actually gotten around to doing it yet. Also, a few others have been concerned that they will be exposing them selves to unessesary risks if they write a review and their lovers/wives/co-workers/children/friends/etc. may find out about their encounters. I don't feel that this is a worry, but they certainly do. So, to each their own, I guess.

 

As far as me posting more messages in here - now that I know about it, I probably will. So, hopefully hopefully we will run into eachother in here again sometime. In the mean time, take care and have fun!! I know I will!!