Where can we find Sean (formerly Worldescrt)

[Guest WorldEscrt Sean]

Rod! Spoken like a true smart ass. I wuv you

[Guest JackLA]

>3 questions:

>

>Sean was about 22 when I met him in 1993, which makes him

>about 30 today - as he states on his website.

>

>Sean is based in LA, but travels to NY and Miami.

 

Of course the thing that really matters is that Sean is WAY beyond hot,and has an amazing sense of class and style. Remember my first

date with Sean where he picked in his own limo (with his own driver)

to make the dinner I had planned at an LA restaurant more fun. Now

THAT'S something doesn't happen with just ANY escort.....

 

And what's up with all this "rice" stuff? A little "off topic" wouldn't you say?

[+ Lucky]

Gosh, Jack, you have been a member for less than a month and already have lots of ideas for us to improve our message board and redeem Sean's horrible image here. I guess you missed that part. Anyway, I'll read your profile when you get it put together.;-)

[Guest Sports]

Thank you Sean.

Does Hagen have strep? Do escorts pick up alot of illnesses? Hagen looks sick in those pictures of him posted on Muscle service. I hope eveything is ok.

[+ bigjoey]

WARNING---WARNING---WARNING

post number 23 by jaidee08 which sounds like an advertisement for sean worldescort is probabally sean who has multiple names here. sean was 30 a long time ago. he gives himself away in a post on the thread titled: New Club "Red" in NYC back a few pages with the last post on december 17 at 5:47 ; in post number 16 on december 14 at 3:48pm, sean says he was very close friends with seymore at rounds who died of AIDS in the early 80's; doing the math that means that sean was about 11 to 13 years old and hanging out at rounds----yea right!!! are you saying that seymore had a fondness for underage boys? look up the post everyone and judge for yourself.

 

having rented sean for an hour, i would say he saw 30 about a decade ago! now what sean needs to know is that older escorts can be great and personally, my favorite escort is 41! there is nothing wrong with being honest as there is a market for older men and those of us that appreciate them; i think i read a review not long ago of an escort in washington in his 50's.

 

sean, you always say too much in your postings and do yourself harm. i was going to comment when you did the post on Club Red but just didn't feel like getting into it with you. however, you have pushed it with the jaidee08 post. i am not attacking you, just hoping for a little honesty here. yes, you are not alone with subtracting years in your postings but do not have one of your alias postings support your claim.

[+ Unicorn]

>WARNING---WARNING---WARNING

>post number 23 by jaidee08 which sounds like an

>advertisement for sean worldescort is probabally sean who

>has multiple names here. sean was 30 a long time ago

 

Actually, post number 1 by jaidee08 sounds like an advertisement for Sean. What a coincidence (?) that it's listed as Jaidee08's first posting on these message boards! Not even clever...

[Scorpio]

>>WARNING---WARNING---WARNING

>>post number 23 by jaidee08 which sounds like an

>>advertisement for sean worldescort is probabally sean who

>>has multiple names here. sean was 30 a long time ago

>

>Actually, post number 1 by jaidee08 sounds like an

>advertisement for Sean. What a coincidence (?) that it's

>listed as Jaidee08's first posting on these message boards!

>Not even clever...

 

It's probably not a good idea to judge someone's newness here by the number of posts next to their name. Because the post counter often gets stuck for those still being moderated. I have no opinion about whether or not jaidee08's post sounded like a commercial for Sean, but it wasn't his first post. More like his eighth from a quick review of the archives.

 

I've been here for over a year and for the longest time my post counter was stuck in the 20s. I'm sure if I took the time to review the archives my post counter should have 20 or 30 more posts next to it.

[Guest CraigSF39]

>Always buy the long grain type if you don't like your rice

>too sticky. Short grain such as calrose and sweet rice are

>primarily for dessert and snacks and gets too sticky when

>cooked.

 

thank you! are you oriental??? im so intrested in orientals, my bf and i love rice and i read a poem about vietnam - its teribel how the US bombed your vilages!!!

 

>I see you can spell correctly if you want to.

 

i try, english is hard spelling, you must understand from those little shapes you use. sayanora :-)

[HooBoy]

I met Sean and had an "off the clock" dinner with him in LA. He documented the evening with a post "Breaking Bread With HooBoy" or something to that effect -- you may find it in the archives. I don't have the time or inclination to look it up.

 

He was charming, handsome and I would guess in his early or mid-30's. But I don't know. From his post about our meeting, you would think we had a pleasant evening.

 

Since then, I have been stunned by his vitriolic comments about me and his own admitted strange actions against clients.

 

I have nothing bad to say about Sean from my limited experience. I think his own posts are enough to reflect what you get.

[+ bigjoey]

as i have often said, an escort's own postings are the best indication of what to expect. rick monroe and matt in vancouver have had great postings and from their reviews are great escorts; the postings reflect their service.

 

as i recall, the sean/hooboy dinner was several years ago and if he appeared to be "early to midthirties" then, he is clearly beyond 30 now. his own post gives his age away; go read it and judge for yourself.

 

he needs to know that "older" escorts can be great and their is nothing wrong with being 40. get ovet it already.

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

>as i recall, the sean/hooboy dinner was several years ago

 

In the interest of accuracy... about 15-16 months ago or so.

 

:-)

[Guest WorldEscrt Sean]

My dinner with Hoo was a year ago NOT several years ago LOL! No wonder BigJoey thinks I'm older than 30. He obviously has no sense of chronology OR TIME. I hear when you get that old the first thing to go is the memory. Didn't some drug company just develop a drug to help people with memory? Hey Joey I'd check into it if I were you.

[Guest JackLA]

>Gosh, Jack, you have been a member for less than a month and

>already have lots of ideas for us to improve our message

>board and redeem Sean's horrible image here. I guess you

>missed that part. Anyway, I'll read your profile when you

>get it put together.;-)

 

Sorry. didn't realize there was a "senority" system and censorship aspect to posting on this board. The primary point of my posting was that I had met Sean awhile back, and contrary to the comments of some others, my experience with him was a very positive one.

 

And regardless of the time that I registered for this board, I have been reading reviews on this site for several years, so I haven't missed anything. Understand there have been many negative things written about Sean, but since my encounter with him was a very pleasant one I thought it reasonable to mention that. I have actually had very few bad experiences with escorts (except for the REALLY hideous Scott Sloan). Maybe I am just a particularly good client. :-)

 

Your point is however noted, and I will hold back from further postings until I have sufficient "senority", and have become a little more bitter. Maybe I should take some lessons from Truth Teller who seems to be the master of coupling acidic vitriol with feigned sincerity.

[Boston Guy]

>Your point is however noted, and I will hold back from

>further postings until I have sufficient "senority", and

>have become a little more bitter. Maybe I should take some

>lessons from Truth Teller who seems to be the master of

>coupling acidic vitriol with feigned sincerity.

 

Jack -

 

If everyone took that approach, we'd have no new posters. You will find that no matter what you post, someone is likely to be unhappy. So the best course is simply to post what you believe.

 

Your posts are interesting and I, for one, hope you keep on posting. :-)

 

BG

[+ Unicorn]

>Sorry. didn't realize there was a "senority" system and

>censorship aspect to posting on this board.

.

.

.

>And regardless of the time that I registered for this board,

>I have been reading reviews on this site for several years,

>so I haven't missed anything. Understand there have been

>many negative things written about Sean, but since my

>encounter with him was a very pleasant one I thought it

>reasonable to mention that.

 

It's not a matter of a seniority system, and no one's censoring anyone. Nevertheless, when a new poster comes up and asks "Where's Sean?" followed an hour or so later by another new or at least fairly new poster with positive comments, it's worthwhile scratching one's head. I also have similar questions when I read the "Newest Reviews" section and find such a large percentage of reviews written by first-time reviewers.

Much as escorts are often revered on this website, I can assure you that quite a few escorts are capable of subterfuge. I have gotten to know over half a dozen escorts fairly well due to repeated or extended hires, and all but one lies about his age (I don't know for sure about the last guy). When someone recently complained that a well-respected member of the escort M4M community refused to refund a sizeable deposit, the client was soundly ridiculed for trusting an escort. The description "Honest Abe," will never be replaced by "Honest as an escort." Nor will "I cannot tell a lie" be the motto of any escorts' association.

I do not mean to imply by any means that all escorts are crooks. Some of the escorts I've met are quite honest, except usually about the age. Many escorts probably don't even lie about their ages. Anyone who doesn't read certain material on this website with a critical eye, however, is bound to be fooled. So do I think "Hmmm..." when someone claims to have been reading this website for years, yet never registered? Ah, I guess I do. ;-)

[Guest jaidee08]

Way too cynical

 

I have read the emerging thread on this and am completely amazed. I am not Sean WorldEscort - but a positive, timely and helpful response to a posters question is met with a wall of suspicion. The original poster responded with a grateful follow up while many other vigilantes decided to question my post and insult Sean into the bargain.

 

Calm down guys. I have submitted one escort review (Danny Cruz in June 2001) and have made a few posts on the message board since September 2001. I live in Switzerland and am a regular traveller to the US, where I lived from 1989-1994. I met Sean at Rounds in early 1993 and saw him on and off until early 1994 when I left the US.

 

What more can I say?

 

Hooboy, keep up the good work and Sean, don't let the vigilantes get you down.

 

Thanks

[+ Lucky]

Gosh, jack, you come out of nowhere with a post endorsing one of the most controversial escorts on this site, we have no idea who you are becaue you can't be bothered to tell us a little bit about yourself in a profile.

Since we know that Sean is capapble of many tricks, don't be surprised that your post stood out.

You will make a great poster here. You whine well, and you love to tell others how they should post.

[Guest JT]

>You will make a great poster here. You whine well, and you

>love to tell others how they should post.

 

Now I know how you came up with your "Posters of the Year" list, I'm hurt! :o :'( x( :+ }>

 

JT (I still lurvvvvvv you, Lucky!)

[Boston Guy]

C'mon, Lucky, give the guy a break.

 

There was a time not so long ago when everyone here was new and no one thought to challenge a poster's legitimacy just because they hadn't already made a lot of posts.

 

New posters can only become established posters by posting. We should welcome anyone who wants to spend some of their own valuable time to post contributions here, so long as they abide by the rules established by HB.

 

Certainly, some escorts will create false personas to try to influence business, just like some clients appear to have had multiple personas over time and probably some still do. But I don't think we should allow those practices to make us be so collectively suspicious that we cease to be welcoming to newcomers.

 

BG

[+ Lucky]

I did. I simply asked him to provide a profile. Is that so hard to do?

[+ Unicorn]

>C'mon, Lucky, give the guy a break.

.

.

>New posters can only become established posters by posting.

>We should welcome anyone who wants to spend some of his

>own valuable time to post contributions here, so long as

>he abides by the rules established by HB.

.

.

>But I don't think we should allow those practices to make us

>be so collectively suspicious that we cease to be welcoming

>to newcomers.

 

I definitely welcome newcomers. I hope the new posters continue to contribute. Yet I would be surprised if anyone told me that when he reads the reviews, he gives equal weight to a first-time versus established reviewer. I think credibility increases with time for people in all walks of life. If I read a movie review from two critics, I'll give more weight to a critic I know and tend to have similar tastes with than to an unknown.

On a similar token, no one is going to pay a lawyer who just graduated from law school the same amount of money one might pay for an established, good lawyer, such as Gerry Spence.

I certainly don't think we should ridicule new posters for being new, nor by any means discourage them from continuing to post. Also, if the post counters are malfunctioning, I hope that problem is corrected. On the other hand, I don't think we should discourage posters from pointing out possible "red flags." These posts are valuable as well.

No one is calling anyone a liar. A little "Hey, look at this!" can be useful, though. And everyone has to prove himself in time for a lot of things... That's life.

[Guest JackLA]

>Gosh, jack, you come out of nowhere with a post endorsing

>one of the most controversial escorts on this site, we have

>no idea who you are becaue you can't be bothered to tell us

>a little bit about yourself in a profile. You will make a great >poster here. You whine well, and you love to tell others how they >should post.

 

 

Gee, this is a tough crowd. Love the way this has turned into an attack and inquisition about me and away from the subject of my original posting.

 

The point of my original posting was not to challenge the postings of others, but to simply point out that my personal experience with Sean has been a positive one, nothing more, nothing less. Had no idea that the accurate recounting of a pleasant encounter would be contrued as so heretical in the context of this forum. My apologies.

 

If all new posters are met with attack simply because they have had experiences that are different than others why would anyone new want to continue to post at all? It's interesting to see revisionist spin interpretations on my comments using words like "whine" and saying that I "love to tell others how they should post". But spin it is. I find reading the experiences of others of interest, am not so invested in confrontation for confrontation's sake that I would expend the effort to whine, and I certainly have no inclination to tell others what they should say or not say. Apparently the reverse is not the case. Whatever....

[+ Lucky]

RE: Where can we find Jack

 

Jack, we don't need any more whiners here. You refuse to provide a profile or anything telling us a little bit about ourself. In any normal conversation, people like to get to know each other a little bit.

Your post dug up an old fracas about Sean, so it would seem natural for you to let us know who you are. Do you hire a lot of escorts? Did you post a review of Sean? Is he a buddy of yours?

You are so welcome to enter the fray of discussion, but after being a lurker, don't expect to have much credibility if you remain an anonymous whiner.

[Boston Guy]

RE: Where can we find Jack

 

Lucky, you're a great guy and I love you. But I still think you're off base on this.

 

First, I don't find anything at all about Jack's posts that strkes me as even close to whining. But your posts to him are starting to come close...

 

Second, you're not asking him for a profile, you're kind of demanding it and not all of us feel the same way about profiles or even the need to have them filled out. For myself, I see them as completely bogus, just like AOL profiles: there's no way on earth to verify the information, so people can use the profile feature to try to make a false personal seem real. Consequently, I don't even look at them.

 

Jack's a new poster and he's come off as pretty even-tempered. His name suggests that he's from LA and we've already learned a bit about him from his first few posts.

 

Most of us have revealed a fair amount about ourselves over the time we've been here. But there are regular posters here who have NEVER, EVER revealed even the slightest bit of personal information about themselves, not even where they're from, much less who they've hired.

 

Posters establish credibility by posting over time -- that's it. In my book, that's the only way.

 

I'm bringing this up again because I think it's worthwhile having new posters here and I think we should be quite tolerant of new guys while they are figuring out how they want to fit in here.

 

Finally, as for the substance of what he says, I posted here a long time ago that I, too, hired Sean Worldescrt once. He wasn't exactly my cup of tea, but he was funny and cordial and I could easily see where some guys would be very taken by him. And he's been in the business for a long time, so he must have a fair number of satisfied customers.

 

So I don't find it at all strange that one of them pops up and says that Sean is a nice guy when a new thread about Sean is created.

 

Lucky, you're one of the good guys. Give the guy a break.

 

BG

[+ Lucky]

RE: Where can we find Jack

 

Jack

As a courtesy to you, a new poster, and at the suggestion of Boston Guy, I hereby give you a break.

One of the ways posters get credibility is over time, so he is right, if I challenge you in your early posts, I might discourage you from keeping posting.

And we want you to keep posting!

Ken