Longest thread ever?

[+ Unicorn]

I wonder if anyone's been keeping count of all prior threads. Is the NG/RM controversy the longest ever?

[+ Unicorn]

I wonder if anyone's been keeping count of all prior threads. Is the NG/RM controversy the longest ever?

[Guest WetDream]

I asked this same question not long ago. The answer was that nobody tracks these things. Too bad. Maybe we could institute a new award for starting the longest thread of the year.

[Guest WetDream]

I asked this same question not long ago. The answer was that nobody tracks these things. Too bad. Maybe we could institute a new award for starting the longest thread of the year.

[Rick Munroe]

>Maybe we could

>institute a new award for starting the longest thread of the

>year.

 

Great idea but who gets to accept the award?

The original author? Or the hustler--I mean person--who appears in the subject title? :*

[Rick Munroe]

>Maybe we could

>institute a new award for starting the longest thread of the

>year.

 

Great idea but who gets to accept the award?

The original author? Or the hustler--I mean person--who appears in the subject title? :*

[marc anthony]

No Kidding! I see it on post #159 already! I took my own advice when it reached the 3 digit level, and just moved on. Too short an attention span.

[marc anthony]

No Kidding! I see it on post #159 already! I took my own advice when it reached the 3 digit level, and just moved on. Too short an attention span.

[Guest CraigSF39]

>No Kidding! I see it on post #159 already! I took my own

>advice when it reached the 3 digit level, and just moved on.

> Too short an attention span.

 

i dont understand this.usually adults have a long attention span and like to disucss issues in a meaningful way, children have short attention spans and move on when things get to long and complex. how old are you, if you dont mind my asking? is there an minimal age requirement for this web sight?

[Guest CraigSF39]

>No Kidding! I see it on post #159 already! I took my own

>advice when it reached the 3 digit level, and just moved on.

> Too short an attention span.

 

i dont understand this.usually adults have a long attention span and like to disucss issues in a meaningful way, children have short attention spans and move on when things get to long and complex. how old are you, if you dont mind my asking? is there an minimal age requirement for this web sight?

[Donnie]

>i dont understand this.usually adults have a long attention

>span and like to disucss issues in a meaningful way

 

If you think there's anything meaningful about the hourly rehashing of bullshit going on in that thread, there is seriously something wrong with you, craig

[Donnie]

>i dont understand this.usually adults have a long attention

>span and like to disucss issues in a meaningful way

 

If you think there's anything meaningful about the hourly rehashing of bullshit going on in that thread, there is seriously something wrong with you, craig

[Guest CraigSF39]

>If you think there's anything meaningful about the hourly

>rehashing of bullshit going on in that thread, there is

>seriously something wrong with you, craig

 

i have learned alot from that thread - people discussing the purpose of this place, the 2 lawyers are discussing interesting legal concepts, other discussions about escort-client relations.although the drama started by the original posting by that sicko about the prostitute he screwed isnt intersting, the other things it led to being talked about is.

 

i think its much better than the typical threads here. i just thought it was wierd that an adult would say that when a discussion gets to long, he leaves. that sounds like what my 5 year-old nefew says.

[Guest CraigSF39]

>If you think there's anything meaningful about the hourly

>rehashing of bullshit going on in that thread, there is

>seriously something wrong with you, craig

 

i have learned alot from that thread - people discussing the purpose of this place, the 2 lawyers are discussing interesting legal concepts, other discussions about escort-client relations.although the drama started by the original posting by that sicko about the prostitute he screwed isnt intersting, the other things it led to being talked about is.

 

i think its much better than the typical threads here. i just thought it was wierd that an adult would say that when a discussion gets to long, he leaves. that sounds like what my 5 year-old nefew says.

[marc anthony]

Craig: Ok, I politely refrained from responding contentiously to you when you mentioned that Broadway shows are only meant for grandmothers from Iowa, but now that you have once again put your unwanted spiteful comments next to my post, I am not going to just stand by again.

 

First of all, Craig, I am old enough to have a profession that brings enough intellectual stimulation and challenge to my life that I can engage in substantive debate and conversation with my colleagues and my employees. I don't need to learn about the world from this message board or any other, as you appear to need to do. I do enjoy the exchange of ideas that goes on here... especially in the context of escorts and the male sex industry, as these are not topics I can discuss with others in my day work.

 

Because this is recreation for me, I am selective about what things I read and respond to. And if it gets too long or tedious, I just move on.

 

I am not sure what past behavior on this board I exhibited that has made you decide that you need to attack my tongue-in-cheek posts, but your apparently unprovoked outbursts cast serious doubt on your previous assertions that you have enough moral fiber to judge the posting behavior of others (e.g. your battles with Traveller).

 

In short, Craig, you have demonstrated that you are immature, spiteful, and hypocritical. And now this discussion is getting too tedious for me as well. I hope you don't take that as a sign that I am too old (as you accused me of being in the Campus thread), or too young (as you accuse me in this one).

[marc anthony]

Craig: Ok, I politely refrained from responding contentiously to you when you mentioned that Broadway shows are only meant for grandmothers from Iowa, but now that you have once again put your unwanted spiteful comments next to my post, I am not going to just stand by again.

 

First of all, Craig, I am old enough to have a profession that brings enough intellectual stimulation and challenge to my life that I can engage in substantive debate and conversation with my colleagues and my employees. I don't need to learn about the world from this message board or any other, as you appear to need to do. I do enjoy the exchange of ideas that goes on here... especially in the context of escorts and the male sex industry, as these are not topics I can discuss with others in my day work.

 

Because this is recreation for me, I am selective about what things I read and respond to. And if it gets too long or tedious, I just move on.

 

I am not sure what past behavior on this board I exhibited that has made you decide that you need to attack my tongue-in-cheek posts, but your apparently unprovoked outbursts cast serious doubt on your previous assertions that you have enough moral fiber to judge the posting behavior of others (e.g. your battles with Traveller).

 

In short, Craig, you have demonstrated that you are immature, spiteful, and hypocritical. And now this discussion is getting too tedious for me as well. I hope you don't take that as a sign that I am too old (as you accused me of being in the Campus thread), or too young (as you accuse me in this one).

[+ Lucky]

Donnie, Donnie, Donnie! Are you a direct descendant of Of nastiness, or did you develop that later?

[+ Lucky]

Donnie, Donnie, Donnie! Are you a direct descendant of Of nastiness, or did you develop that later?

[Guest CraigSF39]

>Craig: Ok, I politely refrained from responding

>contentiously to you when you mentioned that Broadway shows

>are only meant for grandmothers from Iowa, but now that you

>have once again put your unwanted spiteful comments next to

>my post, I am not going to just stand by again.

 

gosh you obviously dont take critism well. thats a sign of a very insecure and miserable person. if you arent able to hear anything said about you without being so upset, maybe you shouldnt post in a public board.

 

>First of all, Craig, I am old enough to have a profession

>that brings enough intellectual stimulation and challenge to

>my life that I can engage in substantive debate and

>conversation with my colleagues and my employees. I don't

>need to learn about the world from this message board or any

>other, as you appear to need to do.

 

i dont think theres anything wrong with learning from other people. usually people like you who cant admit that they can learn from others are very insecure, like you want to prove that you know every thing. you miss out on alot when your like that.

 

alot of people who post here seem smart and know things i dont, i enjoy reading that even when its in long threads. you cant pay attention for long and so you miss out on it. all i said is that it reminds me of the way a child cant focus, and it does.

 

>I am not sure what past behavior on this board I exhibited

>that has made you decide that you need to attack my

>tongue-in-cheek posts, but your apparently unprovoked

>outbursts cast serious doubt on your previous assertions

>that you have enough moral fiber to judge the posting

>behavior of others (e.g. your battles with Traveller).

 

your also very self-centered. i wasnt attacking you, i didnt even remember that you were the one who wrote about broadway shoes. i just politely commented on what i read, and you think its about you. thats sad how you made the hole thing about you when i was just commenting on what i read, not you. your seriously showing alot of problems which i think are sad.

 

and as for traveler, it figures that you wont condemn his rasism. people like you who are insecure and unhappy with yourselves are usually the rasists.

[Guest CraigSF39]

>Craig: Ok, I politely refrained from responding

>contentiously to you when you mentioned that Broadway shows

>are only meant for grandmothers from Iowa, but now that you

>have once again put your unwanted spiteful comments next to

>my post, I am not going to just stand by again.

 

gosh you obviously dont take critism well. thats a sign of a very insecure and miserable person. if you arent able to hear anything said about you without being so upset, maybe you shouldnt post in a public board.

 

>First of all, Craig, I am old enough to have a profession

>that brings enough intellectual stimulation and challenge to

>my life that I can engage in substantive debate and

>conversation with my colleagues and my employees. I don't

>need to learn about the world from this message board or any

>other, as you appear to need to do.

 

i dont think theres anything wrong with learning from other people. usually people like you who cant admit that they can learn from others are very insecure, like you want to prove that you know every thing. you miss out on alot when your like that.

 

alot of people who post here seem smart and know things i dont, i enjoy reading that even when its in long threads. you cant pay attention for long and so you miss out on it. all i said is that it reminds me of the way a child cant focus, and it does.

 

>I am not sure what past behavior on this board I exhibited

>that has made you decide that you need to attack my

>tongue-in-cheek posts, but your apparently unprovoked

>outbursts cast serious doubt on your previous assertions

>that you have enough moral fiber to judge the posting

>behavior of others (e.g. your battles with Traveller).

 

your also very self-centered. i wasnt attacking you, i didnt even remember that you were the one who wrote about broadway shoes. i just politely commented on what i read, and you think its about you. thats sad how you made the hole thing about you when i was just commenting on what i read, not you. your seriously showing alot of problems which i think are sad.

 

and as for traveler, it figures that you wont condemn his rasism. people like you who are insecure and unhappy with yourselves are usually the rasists.

[BewareofNick]

is there an minimal age requirement for this

>web sight?

 

There is no minimum age requirement, but there is a minimum IQ requirement. I am sorry to say that you have not met said requirement and must turn in your decoder ring.

 

And it's website, not web sight, or can't you see that?

[BewareofNick]

is there an minimal age requirement for this

>web sight?

 

There is no minimum age requirement, but there is a minimum IQ requirement. I am sorry to say that you have not met said requirement and must turn in your decoder ring.

 

And it's website, not web sight, or can't you see that?

[BewareofNick]

>i think its much better than the typical threads here. i

>just thought it was wierd that an adult would say that when

>a discussion gets to long, he leaves. that sounds like what

>my 5 year-old nefew says.

 

It's weird, not wierd and it's nephew, not nefew. Just how often do you discuss mail prostitution with this impressionable child that he is able to form an opinion on the subject? In my opinion, such actions should be reported to the child welfare authorities. Lord knows what else you might have done to this child. For shame.

[BewareofNick]

>i think its much better than the typical threads here. i

>just thought it was wierd that an adult would say that when

>a discussion gets to long, he leaves. that sounds like what

>my 5 year-old nefew says.

 

It's weird, not wierd and it's nephew, not nefew. Just how often do you discuss mail prostitution with this impressionable child that he is able to form an opinion on the subject? In my opinion, such actions should be reported to the child welfare authorities. Lord knows what else you might have done to this child. For shame.

[marc anthony]

Craig: I am sorry... but your empty-headed ramblings are not "criticism", as you call it... but empty-headed ramblings.

 

Some Craig quotes from the last 2 days...

 

"I can't imagine anyone would go to a great city like NYC and waste time in boring silly Broadway shows meant for fat mothers from Iowa."

 

"Leave those 18 year old boys alone, sicko."

 

"Is there a minimum age requirement for this web site?"

 

And excuse me, Craig, but I took the liberty of changing all your quotes into English. Those who want to read the full unedited and unabridged edition in its full glory should refer to this thread and the Lounge thread about Campus Escorts.

 

You are right...by the way, I enjoy the company of young (18-21) year old boys. And because I like them, I do enjoy taking them to new places, spending money on them, and showing them a good time with wonderful experiences. And some may consider that sick. But if you think hiring legal escort boys and showing them a good time is such a bad thing, why do you come to this site?

 

Finally, racism is about hate without cause. And Craig, judging from your posts, you are full of that. That's why I stand by my conclusions about you... none of which are good.