Too Good to be True?

[Will]

Today's review of Zach Z in NYC describes an Ivy-educated, urbane, intelligent man who, the reviewer says, you'd never think was an escort. (I'm not sure why that's a compliment.)

 

So far, so good. His other review, published in September, says much the same thing, makes some of the same spelling mistakes, and employs the same bizarre punctuation. Both "reviewers" are good-looking, in their thirties, have lots of money, and one of them can't spell "caramel."

 

If Zach is for real, he sounds great. But is he for real? Has anybody been with him?

[BgMstr4u]

I agree. The two reviews sound very similar, with the same scenarios -- fine dining, not much interested in anal, better looking than the picture, so glad when he opened the door, etc. Same style of writing. If Zach is writing his own material, this would not get him past the first semester when I was in an Ivy League school, lo these many years ago. If he was Ivy, these essayettes indicate a serious decline in Ivy standards!

 

For a guy trying to promote himself, the picture is curious. It is a terrible picture, and appears, both on his aol webpage and in the photo on Hooboy, to have been retouched -- red smears. I'm turned off by it, and if he really is as good looking as his reviewers say, he should get a new picture ASAP!

[+ Charlie]

Will,

 

Eagle-eyed critics like you are why this site is worth visiting. Keep up the good work! I also wondered why such a sophisticated escort would use such a bad picture--unless a better one would spoil the illusion.