Guilty review

[arnemgreeves]

Is it right to mention parts of an encounter that were not good even though the experience was fine? For instance, a provider I saw had a house smelling of dogs and that put me off despite the session being good. It might well put others off too though is it right to omit that? 

[crushme99]

I think the way you asked the question almost answers itself.  I do think it is fair to mention because someone else might view the dogs the same way or have allergies.  As long as you say it was a secondary issue for you but that overall you had a good time ("put me off despite the session being good").